SUSHIL KUMAR BAGLA v. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, JALPAIGURI & ANR
WPA/8452/2016 · 2025-06-26
Shampa Dutt Paul
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24310 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24310 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
26.06.2025
Item No.11 Ct. No. 30 Aloke WPA 8452 of 2016
Sushil Kumar Bagla Vs. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner & Anr.
Mr. Anil Kr. Gupta … for the respondent/PF Authority
None appears for the petitioner on call.
Learned counsel for the respondent/PF Authority is present.
The present writ petitioner is of the year
2016.
As none appears for the petitioner on call, the writ petition stands dismissed for default.
Connected application, if any, stands
disposed of.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Shampa Dutt (Paul), J.)