Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24305 (RAJ)

SURESH SINGH S/O SHRI BHAGWAN SINGH v. MUKESH KUMAR ALIAS MUKESH SINGH S/O SHRI TEJ SINGH

SOSR/281/2025 · 2025-07-18

Uma Shanker Vyas

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application for Suspension of Sentence No.281/2025 In S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1240/2025 Suresh Singh S/o Shri Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Village Jaghina, Tehsil And District Bharatpur, At Present House No. A-4, Ranjeet Nagar, Bharatpur, Police Station Kotwali, Bharatpur (Rajasthan). Presently Lodged At Central Jail Bharatpur) ----Petitioner Versus Mukesh Kumar Alias Mukesh Singh S/o Shri Tej Singh, R/o Bhawanpura Village Jaghina Tehsil and District Bharatpur (Rajasthan) ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sudhir Jain, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Umesh Kumar Sharma, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 18/07/2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties on the application for suspension of sentence. The revision petition has been filed against the order dated 11.12.2024 passed by the learned trial Court in Criminal Case No.146/2019, whereby, the accused-petitioner has been convicted for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and sentenced to undergo one year simple imprisonment along with fine of Rs.55,00,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo two months additional simple (2 of 3) [SOSR-281/2025 in CRLR- 1240/2025] imprisonment. An appeal was preferred by the accused against the said order which was dismissed by the learned appellate Court while affirming/modifying the order of the learned trial Court. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner was on bail during trial as well as during pendency of the appeal and is presently behind the bars. Learned counsel also submits that his financial position is not sound. However, he is ready to deposit the amount as ordered by this Court. Considering the provision of Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and facts and circumstances of the case, this application for suspension of sentence is allowed. The sentence of the accused-applicant namely, Suresh Singh S/o Shri Bhagwan Singh is suspended till final disposal of the revision petition, provided he deposits a sum of Rs.15,00,000/- by way of Demand Draft in the name of complainant in the learned trial Court and also furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before this Court on 20.08.2025 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so. It is also ordered that the original Demand Draft shall be delivered to the complainant subject to an undertaking to be furnished by the complainant in the learned trial Court to the effect that in case the revision petition is decided against him, he (3 of 3) [SOSR-281/2025 in CRLR- 1240/2025] will refund the aforesaid amount along with interest @7% per annum. A copy of this order be sent to the concerned trial Court for compliance. (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J YOGESH KUMAR /23