Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010265482025 2025:GAU-AS:16514 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./3867/2025 SRI AMULYA SAIKIA S/O LATE NABA SAIKIA R/O GHARMORA RANGCHALIA P S NORTH LAKHIMPUR DIST LAKHIMPUR ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. J C GOGOI, MR. S ALI,MR B ISLAM Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA ORDER 02-12-2025 Heard Mr. J. C. Gogoi, learned counsel for the accused applicant and Mr. K. K. Parashar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, for the State. 2. This is an application filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023, praying for granting bail to the accused-applicant, namely, Sri Amulya Saikia in connection with North Lakhimpur PS Case No. 392/2025 under Sections 121(2)/132/296/351(2)/351(3)/3(5) of BNS, 2023 corresponding to G.R. No. 1070/2025. 3. The gist of the allegation as has been narrated in the FIR lodged by one Ankurjyoti Borah, SI of police before the Officer-in-Charge of North Lakhimpur Police Station on 18.11.2025 is that the accused applicant was drunk creating ruckus in the venue wherein there was a celebration of birth day of late Zubeen Garg. The accused applicant was thereafter taken to the police station, wherein the accused applicant allegedly assaulted the complainant. It was also alleged that the sister of the accused applicant came to the police station and tried to assault the complainant. It was submitted that during the assault the complainant got several injuries. 4. The accused applicant is inside the jail for last 12 days as he was arrested on 19.11.2025. 5. The learned counsel for the accused applicant submits that though the accused applicant was drunk and there is some quarrel in between the accused the police and therefore, Section 121(2) is not attracted in the instant case. This Court considered the submission as well as the allegations made in the FIR. 6. After considering the whole matter in its proper perspective, this Court is of the opinion that it is a case, wherein the accused applicant should be granted bail. 7. Accordingly, the accused-applicant is directed to be released forthwith on furnishing of bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty Thousand only) with surety of like nature to the satisfaction Page No.# 3/3 of the learned Court of CJM, Lakhimpur, North Lakhimpur, subject to the following conditions: I. The accused-applicant shall co-operate with the investigation of the case. II. The accused-applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police office. 8. Accordingly, the instant bail application is disposed of as allowed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant