Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24295 (CHH)

MRS. BEENA SHARMA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/810/2021 · 2025-02-04

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:6353 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 810 of 2021 1 - Mrs. Beena Sharma W/o Shishir Prakash Sharma Aged About 35 Years R/o Sector-1 Street 8 Block 18 Bhilai District Durg Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Bhilai Bhatti, District Durg Chhattisgarh 2 - Dr. Shishir Prakash Sharma S/o Prakash Nath Sharma Aged About 45 Years Posted As-Assistant Professor, Government Horticulture Vishwavidyala, R/o Government Horticulture Vishwavidyala Rajnandgaon District Rajnandgaon Chhattigarh 3 - Prakash Nath Sharma S/o B. N. Sharma Aged About 71 Years Retired Employee From Bsp R/o Government Horticulture Vishwavidyala Rajnandgaon District Rajnandgaon Chhattigarh 4 - Smt. Kishori Sharma W/o Prakash Nath Sharma Aged About 69 Years R/o Government Horticulture Vishwavidyala Rajnandgaon District Rajnandgaon Chhattigarh 5 - Piyush Prakash Sharma S/o Prakash Nath Sharma Aged About 44 Years Posted As Professor In Physical Education At Kriti Engineering College, Raipur Chhattigarh R/o No. 4, Manzapara Kanker, District North Bastar Kanker Chhattigarh 2 6 - Smt. Pratistha Sharma W/o Piyush Prakash Sharma Aged About 36 Years Posted As Project Officer Under Chhattisgarh Government R/o No. 4, Manzapara Kanker, District North Bastar Kanker Chhattigarh 7 - Prasun Jha S/o K. K. Jha Aged About 41 Years R/o Village Surgi, P. S. Surgi , District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh 8 - Smt. Gunjan Jha W/o Prasun Jha Aged About 41 Years Posted As Scientist In Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur R/o Village Surgi, P. S. Surgi, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : None. For the State : Shri Neeraj Sharma, Dy. Advocate General. Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma Order on Board 04/02/2025 1. None present for the petitioner in two rounds. 2. Since there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner even in the second round, this Court has left with no other option except to dismiss the CRMP for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the CRMP is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE Kamde NARESH KUMAR KAMDE Digitally signed by NARESH KUMAR KAMDE Date: 2025.02.07 10:48:23 +0530