PARAMANANDA BORAH AND ORS. v. SAUKOT ALI AND 5 ORS.
WA/161/2022 · 2025-10-26
Arun Dev Choudhury
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24288 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24288 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010082362022
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WA/161/2022 1.PARAMANANDA BORAH AND ORS.
S/O LATE PURNANANDA BORAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE ARANDHARA GAON, HOLONGAPAR MOUZA, TEOK CIRCLE, PO KAKOJAN, DIST JORHAT, ASSAM 2: SRI UMANANDA BORAH S/O LATE PURNANANDA ON HIS DEATH MRS. RINA BORA W/O UMANANDA BORAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE ARANDHARA GAON HOLONGAPAR MOUZA TEOK CIRCLE PO KAKOJAN DIST JORHAT ASSAM 3: MRS. SUSHMITA BORA D/O LATE UMANANDA BORAH W.O SRI RAJKUMAR DAS RESIDENT OF VILLAGE TETELIA P.S JALUKBARI PO GOTANAGAR DIST KAMRUP ASSAM 781033 4: SMTI PORISHMITA BORA D/O LATE UMANANDA BORAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE ARANDHARA GAON HOLONGAPAR MOUZA TEOK CIRCLE PO KAKOJAN DIST JORHAT ASSA VERSUS 1.SAUKOT ALI AND 5 ORS.
S/O LT. MINUR ALI, R/O KAKAJAN, P.O. KAKOJAN, DIST- JORHAT 2:THE UNION OF INDIA REP. BY THE SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT ETO. DEPTT. NEW DELHI
Page No.# 2/3 3:THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA THROUGH ITS PROJECT DIRECTOR JORHAT DIST- JORHAT ASSAM 4:PROJECT DIRECTOR NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA JORHAT DIST- JORHAT ASSAM 5:THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY DY. COMMISSIONER JORHAT DIST- JORHAT ASSAM 6:ADDL. DY. COMMISSIONER COMPETENT AUTHORITY LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER OF THE DY. COMMISSIONER DIST- JORHAT ASSAM For the Appellant(s) : None. For the Respondent(s) : Ms. M. Das, Advocate on behalf of Mr. S.K. Medhi, Central Government Counsel. : Mr. C. Baruah, Advocate for respondent Nos.3 & 4. : Ms. R.B. Bora, Junior Government Advocate, Assam.
– B E F O R E – HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. ASHUTOSH KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
27.10.2025 (Ashutosh Kumar, CJ)
The office has reported that nobody had appeared for the petitioners when the writ petition was argued. Even with respect to the present appeal, no one has appeared on behalf of the appellants before the Lawazima Court. It appears that the appellants have lost interest to pursue this case.
Page No.# 3/3 The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Consequently, the connected Interlocutory Application [I.A. (Civil) No.1549/2022] also stands dismissed.
JUDGE CHIEF
JUSTICE
Comparing Assistant