( 2025:JHHC:11233 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.2541 of 2024 ------ Kumari Puja Saha, aged about 35 years, Daughter of Dinesh Kumar Saha, Resident of Village + P.O.- 172 G.T. Road, Isri Bazar, Saha Watch, P.S.- Nimyaghat, Rasuntaura, Dist.- Giridih. … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Jai Deo Sao @ Jaideo Kumar, Son of Late Mahabir Sao, Resident of Jaidev Puja Bhandar, Village + P.O.- Jadodih More, Chandankyari Road, Chas, P.S.- Chas, Dist.- Bokaro 3. Sujata Gorai, Wife of Chandan Gorai, Resident of Jaidev Puja Bhandar, Village + P.O.- Jadodih More, Chandankyari Road, Chas, P.S.- Chas, Dist.- Bokaro. 4. Kedar Gorai, Son of Kartik Chandra Gorai, Resident of Jaidev Puja Bhandar, Village + P.O.- Jadodih More, Chandankyari Road, Chas, P.S.- Chas, Dist.- Bokaro. 5. Mukesh Sao @ Mukesh Kumar Sahu, Son of Late Banarsi Sao, Resident of Village- Dumri, P.O. & P.S.- Dumri, Dist.- Giridih. 6. Moni Sao @ Muniya Devi, Wife of Mukesh Sao, Resident of Village- Dumri, P.O. & P.S.- Dumri, Dist.- Giridih. 7. Sunita Gorai @ Soni Gorai, Wife of Kedar Gorai, Resident of Jaidev Puja Bhandar, Village + P.O.- Jadodih More, Chandankyari Road, Chas, P.S.- Chas, Dist.- Bokaro. … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Niraj Kishore, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vineet Kr. Vashistha, Spl.P.P. ------ Order No:-03 Dated:-11-04-2025 Heard the parties. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner with a prayer for restoration of Cr.M.P. No.2495 of 2022 to its original file which stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 18.03.2024. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Cr.M.P. No.2495 of 2022 stood dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 18.03.2024. It is next submitted that the petitioner was directed to issue notice to opposite party Nos.2 to 7 under registered post with A/D as well as under process of the court for which requisites etc. must be filed within three weeks but due to inadvertence, the same could not be filed within the stipulated period which resulted in dismissal of the said Cr.M.P. No.2495 of 2022 for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 18.03.2024. It is next submitted that non- compliance of the peremptory order dated 18.03.2024 was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in the said Cr.M.P. No.2495 of 2022 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the Cr.M.P. No.2495 of 2022 be restored to its original file. Learned Spl.P.P. appearing for the State has not raised any serious objection. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, Cr.M.P. No.2495 of 2022 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal. Registry is directed to list Cr.M.P. No.2495 of 2022 before the concerned Bench after a week. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is disposed of accordingly. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/