VIRENDRA KUMAR JAIN S/O. LATE SHRI SHRIPAT JAIN v. RATANLAL RADHEY SHYAM FIRM
CW/11308/2025 · 2025-08-04
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24280 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24280 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11308/2025 Virendra Kumar Jain S/o. Late Shri Shripat Jain, Aged About 74 Years, resident of Shripat Bhawan, Near Reliance Fresh, Madan Gopal Road, Ajmer (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. Ratanlal Radhey Shyam Firm, Shripat Building, Madangopal Road, Kesarganj, Ajmer (Raj.)
2. Shri Rajkumar Khandelwal S/o. Late Shri Ratanlal Khandelwal, Office Address- Ratan Beej Company, Shripat Building, Madangopal Road, Kesarganj, Ajmer (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. N.C. Sharma For Respondent(s) :
JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 04/08/2025
1. By way of filing this writ petition, a prayer has been made for issuing directions to the Rent Tribunal, Ajmer to decide the Eviction Application No.45/2022 (CIS) No.78/2022 filed under Section 9 of the Rent Control Act, 2001, within a period of three months.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a senior citizen of the age about 74 years. Counsel submits that the petitioner has filed an application under Section 9 of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 for eviction of the respondent. Counsel submits that the said application is lying pending for its adjudication, so appropriate
(2 of 2) [CW-11308/2025] directions be issued to the Tribunal to decide the said application expeditiously within a period of six months.
3. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on record.
4. The Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of High Court Bar Association, Allahabad vs. State of Uttar Pradesh, while deciding the Criminal Appeal No.3589/2023 has deprecated the practice of the Courts of issuing directions to the subordinate Courts to decide the matter in a timeline.
5. The aforesaid directions cannot be issued by this Court. But looking to the fact that the petitioner is a senior citizen aged about 74 years, it is expected from the Rent Tribunal to make all possible endeavours to decide the eviction application expeditiously.
6. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/29