1 2025:CGHC:44967 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR REVP No. 147 of 2025 1 - Shreemanthula Kumaraswamy S/o Chandra Shekhar Aged About 53 Years R/o Amleshwar, Tahsil Patan, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Punjab National Bank Through Its Authorized Officer Branch Office Tatibandh District Raipur, Chhattisgarh Pin 492001 2 - The Collector Durg District Durg, Chhattisgarh 3 - Tahsildar Patan District Durg, Chhattisgarh 4 - Neha Pandey W/o Omprakash Pandey R/o Sheetala Mohalla Mahadev Ghat Road Near Ram Temple, Raaypura Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh 5 - Chief General Manager Through Rbi Financial And Development Dept Central Office 10th Floor, Central Office Building Shahid Bhagat Singh Marg P.B. No. 10014, Mumbai 400001 Maharashtra 6 - Salil Jha Notary Advocate District Session Court District Durg Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raman Mishra, Advocate. For Respondent(s) No. 1 : Mr. Sharad Mishra, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Devesh G. Kela, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 03/09/2025 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following prayer:- “1. Review the order dated 01/05/2025 annexure A-1 for not considering the illegal auction and statutory violations. 2. Declare the auction and sale deed as illegal and void for non-compliance with Section 13(8) of the SARFAESI Act. 3. Quash the possession order dated 23/12/2024 passed by the District Magistrate, Durg, for being passed without proper notice and in violation of the petitioner's right of redemption. 4. Pass such other or further order(s) as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the interest of justice and equity..” 2. This review petition has been filed by the petitioner against the order dated 1.5.2025 passed in WPC No. 2025/2025. 3. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and after going through the record, I do not find any legal error apparent on the 3 face of the record in the judgment under review. 4. Accordingly, the review petition deserves to be and is hereby dismissed. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat