Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24277 (RAJ)

MANOJ KUMAR S/O BANARASI LAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/919/2025 · 2025-08-07

Bhuwan Goyal, Inderjeet Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:30498-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 919/2025 Manoj Kumar S/o Banarasi Lal, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Bodiya Kuaa, Ward No. 08 Sighana, Police Station Sighana, District Jhunjhunu, Jail Jhunjhunu (But Presently Confined In Open Air Camp, Jhunjhunu) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. District Magistrate, Jhunjhunu. 3. Deputy Superintendent District Jail, Jhunjhunu. 4. Jailor (In-Charge) Open Air Camp, Jhunjhunu. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Bhavna Ladha for Mr. Dheeraj Singhal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, Addl. G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 07/08/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 27.05.2025 issued by the District Magistrate Jhunjhunu, to the extent of imposing the condition of furnishing two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each while releasing him on sixth regular parole of forty days. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the financial condition of the petitioner is very poor and he is unable to submit two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each. He also submits that earlier also the condition of furnishing two sureties while releasing him on [2025:RJ-JP:30498-DB] (2 of 2) [CRLW-919/2025] forth and fifth parole was waived by this Court. Therefore, he prays that the condition of furnishing two sureties imposed in the order dated 27.05.2025 may be waived and the petitioner be released on submitting personal bond of Rs.50,000/- only. 3. Learned Addl. Government Advocate has filed reply to the writ petition and opposed the submissions raised by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. We have perused the report of Patwari Halka Singhana, District Jhunjhunu dated 17.07.2025 (Annexure-R/2) submitted by the respondents along with their reply, according to which, the petitioner is not having any movable or immovable property and his financial condition is very poor. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the present case, the report of Patwari Halka Singhana, District Jhunjhunu dated 17.07.2025 (Annexure-R/2) and the fact that the condition of furnishing surety bonds by the petitioner was earlier also waived by this Court on two occasions, we deem it just and proper to allow this writ petition. 6. Consequently, this writ petition is allowed. The condition of furnishing two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each imposed in the order dated 27.05.2025 passed by the District Magistrate Jhunjhunu, qua the petitioner is waived and it is ordered that the petitioner shall be released on sixth regular parole of forty days on his furnishing personal bond of Rs.50,000/- only. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J PAYAL DHAWAN /57