Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24265 (JHR)

RAMVOTAR RAM ALIAS RAMOUTAR RAM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./5180/2025 · 2025-09-09

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:27299 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 5180 of 2025 1. Ramvotar Ram @ Ramoutar Ram, aged about 74 years, son of Chhedi Ram 2. Harindra Ram @ Harendra Kumar Ram, aged about 34 years, son of Kailash Ram 3. Vishal Ram @ Vishal Kumar Chandravanshi, aged about 29 years Son of Ashok Ram Ashok Kumar Ram. 4. Abhishek Ram @ Abhishek Kumar, Aged about 24 years, Son of Vinay Ram @ Binay Kumar Ram. 5. Deepak Ram @ Deepak Kumar, Aged about 35 years, Son Ramvotar Ram @ Ramoutar Ram. 6. Bablu Ram @ Bablu Kumar, Aged 29 years, Son of Dhalo Ram @ Surendra Ram 7. Surendra Ram, Aged about 46 years, Son of Chandra Ram Ramchandra Ram. 8. Sakindra Ram, Aged about 48 years, son of Chandra Ram Ramchandra Ram. 9. Sintu Kumar, Aged about 24 years, Son of Surendra Kumar @ Surendra Ram. 10. Subodh Ram, Aged about 36 years, Late Bhuneshwar Ram. All residents of village Banachak, P.O. Parsauni, P.S. Itkhori, District- Chatra ...... … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners :Mr. Anupam Anand, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shailesh Kr. Sinha, A.P.P. 02/ 09.09.2025: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Itkhori P.S. Case No. 90 of 2023, registered for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 153(A), 295(A), 352, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chatra. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegations are made that 200 people have assembled at a place and it has been alleged that they were hurling religious slogans. He submits that in the similar circumstance, the other co-accused persons have already been provided the privilege of anticipatory bail in A.B.A. No. 6069 of 2024 and ( 2025:JHHC:27299 ) A.B.A. No. 4488 of 2025. 4. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of disturbing the harmony of the society. 5. Considering that 200 people are alleged to be there and further the other co-accused persons have already been provided the privilege of anticipatory bail in the aforesaid A.B.As, I am inclined to provide privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the petitioners, named above, are hereby directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today, and in the event of their surrender/arrest, the petitioners, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chatra, in connection with Itkhori P.S. Case No. 90 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-