[2025:RJ-JP:19897] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6476/2025 Lal Chand S/o Shri Birdhi Chand Kumawat, Aged About 60 Years, The Then Head Constable No. 1888/467, Police Station Mahesh Nagar, Jaipur City (South), Presently Resident Of House No. 94- B, Vikas Nagar-C, 200 Feet Bye Pass, Ajmer Road, Jaipur, Ra- jasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director General Of Police Rajasthan, Police Headquarters, Lal Kothi, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Police Commissioner, Commissionerate, Government Hos- tel Circle, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. Deputy Police Commissioner (South), Commissionerate, Government Hostel Circle, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 5. Director, Pension Department, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur, Ra- jasthan. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11448/2024 Narpat Singh S/o Shri Ishwar Singh, Aged About 66 Years, Re- tired Assistant Sub- Inspector, Police Station Mahesh Nagar, Jaipur (South), Presently Resident Of Plot No. 22, Scheme- 10, Kamla Nehru Nagar, Ajmer Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director General Of Police Rajasthan, Police Headquarters, Lal Kothi, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Police Commissioner, Commissionerate, Government Hos- tel Circle, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. Deputy Police Commissioner (South), Commissionerate, [2025:RJ-JP:19897] (2 of 3) [CW-6476/2025] Government Hostel Circle, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 5. Director, Pension Department, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipru, Ra- jasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jai Kishan Yogi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG Ms. Megha Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 12/05/2025 Since, both these writ petitions share similar facts and com- mon question(s) of law, they have been heard together and are being disposed of vide this common order. Learned counsel for the respective parties agreed that the is- sue involved herein is no more res integra and stands resolved by a coordinate Bench order of this Court dated 03.01.2025 passed in the case of Nathu Lal Jaroli versus State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10394/2011 and pray for disposal of the writ petitions in terms thereof. In the case of Nathu Lal Jaroli (supra), this Court held that order passed under Rule 54 of the Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951 forfeiting the monetary benefits except the subsistence allowances for the suspension period on account that acquittal of the em- ployee was not honorable but, extending the benefit of doubt, is not tenable and is bad in law. In view thereof, the orders impugned in the writ petitions dated 22.07.2024 and dated 19.03.2024 are quashed and set aside and the respondents are directed to pay salary and other al- [2025:RJ-JP:19897] (3 of 3) [CW-6476/2025] lowances for the petitioners for the suspension period within a pe- riod of twelve weeks from today. If the payment is not made within the stipulated period, the arrears shall carry interest @ 6% per annum and the Officer(s) re- sponsible for the delay would bear the interest. In view thereof, the writ petition is disposed of. Pending ap- plication(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Manish/14-15