Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24261 (RAJ)

VIKRAM SINGH S/O RAMPRATAP SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/8909/2025 · 2025-08-29

Ashok Kumar Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:34795] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8909/2025 1. Vikram Singh S/o Rampratap Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village Chhapla, Police Station Aasop, District Jodhpur, Raj. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). 2. Pradeep Choudhary S/o Late Shri Hakim, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Madoni, Police Station Sewar, District Bharatpur, Raj. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajeev Kumar Sogarwal Mr. Aditya Joshi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, Pp HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 29/08/2025 1. Instant application for bail is filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the applicants-accused Vikram Singh S/o Rampratap Singh and Pradeep Choudhary S/o Late Shri Hakim in FIR No. 433/2025 dated 29.06.2025 registered at P.S. Shipra Path District -Jaipur City (South), whereby the applicant- accused was charged under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 61(2) of BNS and 66C and 66D of IT Act. 2. The applicants were arrested and are in judicial custody since their arrest. The Court below has dismissed the bail application. [2025:RJ-JP:34795] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-8909/2025] 3. Learned counsel for the applicants relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the applicants are innocent and falsely implicated in the present case. Further, he submits that the investigation relating to present applicants-accused is complete and are no more required by the Investigating Agency for investigation. He further assures that in case, the applicants-accused are required the applicants-accused will be available. He also submits that the trial will take its own time and no purpose will be served by keeping the applicants-accused in custody. 4. Learned counsel for petitioners submitted that on the basis of suspicion police has arrested petitioners and on the basis of recovery of mobile, laptop and other material have filed a charge-sheet against the petitioner. He further submitted that not a single complainant or victim has approached the police to file a complaint against any of the petitioners. He further submitted that not a single legal evidence is available against the petitioner to show that theses petitioners have committed any cheating or cyber crime with anyone. He further submitted that the police has alleged that petitioners have committing cheating on false promise of job but none of the complainant has recorded his statement to police to verify the allegations made by police. He also submitted that there is no criminal antecedent against Vikarm and one case of year 2021 is against Pradeep Choudhary. 5. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor. He submitted report received from concerned police station and same is taken on record. [2025:RJ-JP:34795] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-8909/2025] 6. Heard learned counsel for the applicants-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record. 7. On the basis of suspicion, police has detained three persons Vikram, Raj and Pradeep, who were sitting in room No.203 of Hotel Jaipur one, SFS, Mansarovar Jaipur and on interrogation police has recovered mobile phone, laptop and other material along with their social media account in different names. Police has found that these persons are involved in cyber criminal activity and online cheating. The police has connected the details with 18 complaints registered on cyber crime police portal (1930) and further arrested Pradeep Choudhary and Vikram and filed charge- sheet against them. There is no criminal antecedent against the petitioner Vikram Singh but one case is registered at P.S. Sewar against Pradeep. 8. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicants-accused are no more required in the investigation and they are in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicants-accused. 9. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicant- accused Vikram Singh S/o Rampratap Singh and Pradeep Choudhary S/o Late Shri Hakim, is hereby allowed and the applicants-accused are ordered to be [2025:RJ-JP:34795] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-8909/2025] released on bail with condition that each of the petitioners upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicants-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicants-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicants-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicants-accused shall be liable to be canceled. 10. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /76