Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24261 (HP)

POOJA SHARMA v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/14294/2025 · 2025-09-04

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 14276/2025 a/w connected matters Decided on: 04.09.2025 1. CWP No.14276/2025 Rup Lal …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. 2. CWP No.14292/2025 Thakur Mahip Singh …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. 3. CWP No.14294/2025 Pooja Sharma …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. 4. CWP No.14296/2025 Labh Singh …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. 5. CWP No.14298/2025 Sunita Thakur …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. ……………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 For the petitioner(s): Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate. For the respondent*s): Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate Generl with Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J Notice. Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Petitioners’ grievance is that their respective representation(s) annexed with these writ petitions, seeking applicability of Mohit Sharma Vs. State of H.P. & Ors.2 have not been decided till date by the respondents/competent authority. Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submitted that the petitioner(s) would be content, in case, respondents/competent authority are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation(s) of the petitioner(s), in accordance with law, within a time bound manner. Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection to this prayer. Having regard to the above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matters, these writ petitions are disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation(s) of the petitioner(s), in accordance with law and as well as taking into consideration the above judgment in case of Mohit Sharma2, within a period of six 2CWP No. 1638 of 2024, decided on 29.11.2024 3 weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner(s). Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 04th September, 2025(rohit)