Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. MP(M) No. 2093 of 2025 Date of Decision : 28.8.2025 Sanjeev Kumar ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 No. For the petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Sparsh Bhushan, Advocate. For the respondent/State : Mr. Jitender Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Jitender Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents-State.
2. Copy of FIR stands filed which shows that the offences mentioned therein are bailable.
3. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, submits that he wants to withdraw the present petition at this stage. Hence, the petition is 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
2 dismissed as withdrawn, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 28th August, 2025 (Chander)