:*> APHC010341802025 Hi'H IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI A Of WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI I.A Nos.1 and 2 of 202^ PRATAPA in/and CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7193 OF 2025 Between: 1. Sandaka Suresh, S/o Panasayya, Aged about 27 years. R/o Krishnavaram Village Kirlampudi Mandal, East Godavari District. 2. Gandham Srinu, S/o Venkata Rao, Aged about 35 Village. Peddapuram Mandal, East Godavari District. 3. Gandham Swamy, S/o Venkata Rao, Aged about 25 Village, Peddapuram Mandal, East Godavari District. 4. Gandham Venkata Rao, S/o Pallarao, Aged about 65 Marlava Village, Peddapuram Mandal, East Godavari District. 5. Sandaka Srinu, S/o Panasayya, Aged about 31 Village, Peddapuram Mandal, East Godavari District. 6. Sandaka Panasayya, S/o Surya Rao, Aged about Krishnavaram Village, kirlampudi Mandal, East Godavari District. years, R/o Marlava years, R/o Marlava years, R/o years, R/o Marlava 60 years, R/o ...Petitioners/Accused No.1 to 6 AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, at Amaravati y 2. Bodiredla Subba Rao, S/o Tata Rao, Aged about 30 years, R/o Krishnavaram Village, kirlampudi Mandal, East Godavari District. ...Respondents Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in S.C.No. 162/2017 Dated: 05.11.2018 on the file of the court of the Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapuram, challenged in C.A. No. 377 of 2018 on the file of the VII Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court) Peddapuram, East Godavari District. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Between: Bodiredla Subba Rao, S/o Tata Rao, Aged about 30 years, R/o Krishnavaram Village, kirlampudi Mandal, East Godavari District. ...Petitioners/Respondent No.2 AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, at Amaravati. (R1) 2. Sandaka Suresh, S/o Panasayya, Aged about 27 years, R/o Krishnavaram Village Kirlampudi Mandal, East Godavari District. 3. Gandham Srinu, S/o Venkata Rao, Aged about 35 years, R/o Marlava Village, Peddapuram Mandal, East Godavari District. 4. Gandham Swamy, S/o Venkata Rao, Aged about 25 years, R/o Marlava Village, Peddapuram Mandal, East Godavari District. 5. Gandham Venkata Rao, S/o Pallarao, Aged about 65 years, R/o Marlava Village, Peddapuram Mandal, East Godavari District. 6. Sandaka Srinu, S/o Panasayya, Aged about 31 years, R/o Marlava Village, Peddapuram Mandal, East Godavari District. 7. Sandaka Panasayya, S/o Surya Rao, Aged about 60 years, R/o Krishnavaram Village, kirlampudi Mandal, East Godavari District. ...Respondents r Petition under Section 320 (6) of Cr.P.C and 359 (6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioners herein to enter into compromise in the CRL.P.No. of 2025 in calendar and judgment Dt; 05.11.2018, passed in S.C.No 162/2017 on the file of the court of the Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapuram, thereby allowing the Appeal in C.A.No. 377 of 2018 pending before the Court of the Additional District Judge Peddapuram of East Godavari District registered for the offences under Section 307 of I PC. lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Between: Bodiredia Subba Rao, S/o Tata Rao, Aged about 30 years, R/o Krishnavaram Village, kirlampudi Mandal, East Godavari District. ...Petitioners/Respondent No.2 AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, at Amaravati. (R1) 2. Sandaka Suresh, S/o Panasayya, Aged about 27 years, R/o Krishnavaram Village Kirlampudi Mandal, East Godavari District. 3. Gandham Srinu, S/o Venkata Rao, Aged about 35 years, R/o Marlava Village, Peddapuram Mandal, East Godavari District. 4. Gandham Swamy, S/o Venkata Rao, Aged about 25 years, R/o Marlava Village, Peddapuram Mandal, East Godavari District. 5. Gandham Venkata Rao, S/o Pallarao, Aged about 65 years, R/o Marlava Village, Peddapuram Mandal, East Godavari District. 6. Sandaka Srinu, S/o Panasayya, Aged about 31 years, R/o Marlava Village, Peddapuram Mandal, East Godavari District. % 7. Sandaka Panasayya, S/o Surya Rao, Aged about 60 years, R/o Krishnavaram Village, kirlampudi Mandal, East Godavari District. ...Respondents Petition under Section 320 (2) of Cr.P.C and 359 (2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise entered between the Petitioner and the 2nd Respondent and set aside the calendar and judgment Dt: 05.11.2018, passed in S.C.No 162/2017 on the file of the court of the Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapuram, thereby allowing the Appeal in C.A.No. 377 of 2018 pending before the Court of the Additional District Judge Peddapuram of East Godavari District registered for the offences under Section 307 of I PC. *Joint compromise memo enclosed vide separate sheet lA NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased stay all further proceedings in C.A. No 377 of 2018 dated 23.08.2024 on the file of the court of the VII Additional District Judge (FTC), Peddapuram, East Godavari District. Pending disposal of the quash petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri Sivaprasad Reddy Venati Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Public Prosecutor Counsel for the Respondent No.2: Sri P Ravikanth The Court made the following order: 1 APHC010341802025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7193/2Q2fi PRADESH [3396] PRATAPA Between: 1.SANDAKA SURESH, S/0 PANASAYYA, R/0 KRISHNAVARAM VILLAGE GODAVARI DISTRICT 2.GANDHAM SRINU,. S/0 VENKATA RAO, R/O MARLAVA VILLAGE, GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3.GANDHAM SWAMY,, S/0 VENKATA RAO, AGED R/O MARLAVA VILLAGE GODAVARI DISTRICT. AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, KIRLAMPUDI MANUAL, EAST AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS PEDDAPURAM MANDAL, EAST ABOUT 25 YEARS, EAST PEDDAPURAM MANDAL 4.GANDHAM VENKATA RAO vcAoo PALLARAO, aged about 65 YEARS, R/O MARLAVA VILLAGE, PEDDAPURAM GODAVARI DISTRICT. MANDAL, EAST 5.SANDAKA SRINU,, S/0 PANASAYYA, AGED ABOUT MARLAVA VILLAGE, PEDDAPURAM DISTRICT. ® PANASAYYA,, S/0 SURYA RAO, AGED ABOUT YEARS, R/O KRISHNAVARAM VILLAGE, KIRLAMPUDI EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 31 YEARS, R/O MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI 60 MANDAL, ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT REP. BY ITS PUBLIC OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AT 2 0 AMARAVATI 2.B0DIREDIA SUBBA RAO, S/0 TATA RAO, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, EAST R/0 KRISHNAVARAM VILLAGE, KIRLAMPUDI MANDAL, GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court pleased to record the compromise entered between the Petitioners and the 2nd Respondent and set aside the calendar and judgment Dt: 05.11.2018, passed in S.C.No 162/2017 on the file of the court of the Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapuram, thereby allowing the Appeal in C.A. No. 377 of 2018 pending before the Court of the Learned Additional District Judge Peddapuram, East Godavari District and pass lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioners herein to enter into compromise in the CRL.P.No. OF 2025 in calendar and judgment Dt; 05.11.2018, passed in S.C.No 162/2017 on the file of the court of the Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapuram, thereby allowing the Appeal in C.A.No. 377 of 2018 pending before the Court of the Learned Additional District Judge Peddapuram of East Godavari District registered for the offences under Section 307 of I PC and be pleased to pass lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise entered between the Petitioner and the 2nd Respondent and set aside the calendar and judgment Dt: 05.11.2018, passed in S.C.No 162/2017 on the file of the court of the Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapuram, thereby allowing the Appeal in C.A.No. 377 of 2018 pending before the Court of the Learned Additional District Judge Peddapuram of East Godavari District registered for the offences under Section 307 of IPC and be pleased to pass lA NO: 3 OF 2025 3 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased stay all further proceedings in C.A. No 377 of 2018 dated 23.08.2024 on the file of the court of the VII Additional District Judge (FTC), Peddapuram, East Godavari District. Pending disposal of the quash petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1.SIVAPRASAD REDDY VENATI Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S); 1.P RAVIKANTH 2.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR . - y 4 % THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA I.A.Nos.l and 2 of 2025 In/and CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7193/2025 COMMON ORDER: The instant Criminal Petition under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Act, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS act’) has been filed, by the Petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 6, seeking to record the compromise entered between the parties and set aside the calendar and judgment dated 05.11.2018 passed in SC No.162 of 2017, on the file of the court of Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapuram and thereby allowing the appeal in C.A.No.377 of 2018 on the file of VII Additional District Judge (FTC), Peddapuram, East Godavari District. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, petitioners/accu sed No.1 to 6 and the respondents No.2/complainant are present before this / Court. They produced their respective attested copies of Aadhar cards in proof of their identity and the same were placed on record for proper identification. Both the learned counsel on record have identified both the parties in the open Court. 3. The complainant/respondent No.2 represented that he has voluntarily come forward to enter into compromise in this case since all the accused are his friends and neighbors and there is no force or fear to enter the compromise in this case. 5 4. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that compromise may be recorded since the complainant/respondent No.2 himself realized that there is no case to prosecute. Considering the submissions made, it is apposite to allow the I.A.Nos.1' and 2 of 2025 by setting aside the calendar and judgment dated 05.11.2018 passed in SC No.162 of 2017, on the file of the court of Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapuram and thereby allowing the appeal in C.A.No.377 of 2018 on the file of VII Additional District Judge (FTC), Peddapuram, East Godavari District. 5. 6. Accordingly, LA.Nos.1 and 2 are allowed. Since both the parties entered into compromise, no further orders are required in this matter. Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is allowed. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand 7. closed. Sd/-B PRASADA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ;r ^ SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The VII Addl. District Judge (FTC), Peddapuram, East Godavari District. 2. The Additional District Judge, Peddapuram, East Godavari District. 3. The Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddapuram, East Godavari District. 4. The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Prathipadu, East Godavari District 5. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Kiralampudi Police Station, East Godavari District. 6. One CC to Sri Sivaprasad Reddy Venati Advocate [OPUC] 7. One CC to Sri P Ravikanth Advocate [OPUC] 8. Two CC's to The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati [OUT] 9. Two CD Copies SAM sree ♦along with joint compromise memo to the addresses HIGH COURT DATED:16/07/2025 COMMON ORDER I.A Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 in/and CRLP No. 7193 of 2025 5 ofAuej® Currant Stcinn 5»J ALLOWING THE I.A Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 AND ALLOWING THE CRLP iJOINTMEMO_RLEDBY J^^^i-PgliHONERS AMn oND RESPOMnFKij 1. It IS submitted that'the above criminal petition is filed by the entered between the Petitioner ■ cTr?''”' 'n C.A. No. 377 of 2018 District Judge Peddap record the compromise and set aside the petitioners to and the 2"^ Respondent 162/2017 on the file of the thereby allowing the Appeal of the Learned Additional pending before the Court uram registered for the offences under Section 307 of IPC. 2- That due intervention respondent entered into the parties hereto have to settle their differences of elders and well-wiwishers, the petitioners 2nd and the compromise and agreed to settle the disputes. That resolved the differences among themselves and agreed on the following terms; a) That the 2"<' Respondent has entered into case against the petitioners herein case in in S.C no 162/2017 Sessions Judge, Peddapuram VN Additional District compromise and withdraw the agreed to pu.rsuing court of the Assistant no 377 of 2018 on the file ' Godavari District, and not interested in the criminal ^ on the file of the and Criminal Appeal Judge (FTC) Peddapuram registered for the offences under Section 307 of IPC. b) That the 2« Respondent entered between the Petitioner calendar and judgment Dt: i Ofthe court Of the Assistant Sessions Judge, Peddap has no objection to record the and the 2« Respondent compromise and set aside the 05-11-2018, passed in S.C no 162/2017 on the file thereby allowing the - of the Learned uram, uram As such we have filed a petition seeking the Hon’ble Court to record the . compromise. The contents mentioned in the said compromise petition are true and correct to the best of our knowledge and belief. The said compromise is entered with our free will and consent and without any undue influence from anyone. Hence, we are filing the present Joint Memo. Hence the Joint Memo. Sandaka Suresh (A1) 1. 2. Gandham Srinu (A2) , ' liSJ Gandham Swamy (A3)" o 3. 4. Gandham Venkata Rao {A4) , 5. Sandaka Srinu (A5) - Sandaka Panasayya (A6) 6. Bodiredla Subba Rao (Defacto Complainant) CounswferPetitloners Counsel for 2"^^ Respondent