Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2425 (RAJ)

GOVIND SINGH S/O SHRI AMAR SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/1363/2025 · 2025-03-25

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:13508] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1363/2025 Govind Singh S/o Shri Amar Singh, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Intkheda Adda, Bharatpur ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur 2. District Collector, Bharatpur. 3. Sub-Divisional Officer, Bayana, District Bharatpur 4. Tehsildar, Bayana, District Bharatpur 5. Badan S/o Mohar Singh 6. Rajhans S/o Mohar Singh 7. Hedan S/o Badan Singh 8. Mathan S/o Badan Singh 9. Vikram S/o Badan Singh 10. Jhuri S/o Goverdhan 11. Jitendra S/o Jhuri Gurjar 12. Virendra Singh S/o Jhuri 13. Mansingh S/o Jhuri Respondent No.5 to 13 are R/o Intkheda Tehsil Bayana District Bharatpur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohar Pal Meena with Mr. Kishan Lal Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Neeraj Batra, GC with Ms. Gunjan Chawla and Mr. P.L. Bairwa HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 25/03/2025 [2025:RJ-JP:13508] (2 of 2) [CW-1363/2025] Learned State Counsel submits that this writ petition is rendered infructuous inasmuch as the proceeding under Section 91 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 has already initiated against the encroachers on the subject land. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the aforesaid statement. In view thereof, the civil writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J YOGESH/44