IN T 360 M/s T.S. Ma Shri Satpal M/s City Po CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU appellants/d learned Cou recovery of appellants s parties hav compromise appeal may the parties. order dated Muzaffarna RSA-1160-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR Regular Second Appeal No.116 Date of decision :-05.03.2026 T.S. Mann, Transport through its pa Satpal Mann and others Versus ity Point Automobile AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Jatin Kumar, Advocate for Mr. Gaurav Datta, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Shvetanshu Goel, Advocate for the caveator-respondent. I GUPTA J. (Oral) The present appeal has lants/defendants against the concurren d Courts below whereby the suit filed b ery of a sum of Rs.27,31,242/- has been At the outset, learned counsel lants submits that during the pendency s have amicably settled their dispu romise. It is submitted that in view of th l may be disposed of in terms of the co rties. Learned counsel for the appellant h dated 20.12.2025 passed by the learn ffarnagar, depicting the settlement effect 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH o.1160 of 2025 (O & M) partner/authorized signatory …..Appellants …..Respondent NIDHI GUPTA e for ocate has been preferred by the current findings recorded by the ed by the respondent/plaintiff for been decreed. unsel appearing on behalf of the ndency of the present appeal, the ispute and have arrived at a of the said settlement, the present the compromise arrived at between ellant has handed over a copy of the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), t effected between the parties in the VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.06 16.08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document T.C. Execut Mann etc.”. acknowledg compromise counsel for resolved and this Court settled that Court shoul litigation. compromise March 05, 2 Vijay Asija Whether spe Whether Rep RSA-1160-2025 (O & M) Execution-32-2025 titled as “M/s City P etc.”. The same is taken on record. Learned counsel appearing for t wledges the aforesaid submission and d romise between the parties. This Court has considered the s el for the parties. Since the dispute between th ed and the compromise has been arrived ourt finds no legal impediment in ac d that once the parties have settled their should give effect to such settlement Accordingly, the present appeal romise arrived at between the parties. Pending application(s), if any, sh , 2026 Asija er speaking/reasoned Yes / No er Reportable Yes / No 2 City Point Automobile vs. M/s T.S. g for the respondent/plaintiff fairly and does not dispute the factum of the submissions made by learned een the parties stands amicably rrived at voluntarily between them, in accepting the same. It is well their inter se dispute amicably, the ment so as to bring quietus to the ppeal is disposed of in terms of the any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.06 16.08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document