APHC010342492025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 17108 Between: Patan Mastan Vali State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KOCHIRI RAJA SHEKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 17108 OF 2025 AND State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: KOCHIRI RAJA SHEKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3460] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 17108 OF 2025 ORDER: The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of the Respondents 3 and 4, in threatening to demolish the Petitioner’s shop bearing D.No. 28-43, 44, (Assessment No.1131011333), Lawyerspet, situated on the northern side of Narasaraopet - Kurnool Road, Vinukonda Town, Palnadu District, without following due process of law as illegal and arbitrary. 2. The Petitioner claims to be the owner of the madras tiled shed of an extent of 9.72 sq.yds bearing D.No. 38, Block No.28 situated in Vinukonda, through a Registered Sale Deed No. 3239/1995, dated 04.09.1995. As there was a threat of dispossession, the present Writ Petition came to be filed. 3. Ms. V. Sireesha Rani, learned Standing Counsel for the Respondent No.4/ Municipality, on instructions, would submit that the Respondent No.4 will follow the procedure as contemplated under law, in case, any action is to be initiated against the Petitioner in respect of subject property. 4. Taking note of the submissions made by learned Standing Counsel for the Respondent No.4, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the Respondents to examine the title deeds of the Petitioner, in respect of subject property, before initiating any action against the Petitioner, if necessary, and follow the procedure as recognized under law. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 09.07.2025 KK