Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010242822025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3535/2025 THE STATE BANK OF INDIA INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN CORPORATE CENTRE, STATE BANK OF INDIA MADAME CAMA ROAD, NARIMAN POINT MUMBAI-40021 AND HAVING ITS LOCAL HEAD OFFICE AT G.S. ROAD, GUWAHATI-781005 2: THE ZONAL MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA GUWAHATI ZONE ABC G.S. ROAD BHANGAGARH P.O- DISPUR GUWAHATI-781005 3: THE GENERAL MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA REGION-I ADMINISTRATIVE UNIT G.S. ROAD BHANGAGARH PO.- DISPUR GUWAHATI-78100 VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, 3RD FLOOR, JEEVAN DEEP BUILDING, SANSAD MARG, NEW DELHI-110001 2:GIRISH CHANDRA DEKA S/O LATE SARAT DEKA R/O VILL- DHAMDHAMA BARNORIKONA P.O.- BARBARI DIST- NALBARI ASSAM PIN-78135 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A K SAHEWALLA, S SENGUPTA,MR. W SHARMA Page No.# 2/4 Advocate for the Respondent : MR. B PURKAYASTHA, Linked Case : WP(C)/4154/2025 GIRISH CHANDRA DEKA S/O LATE SARAT DEKA R/O VILL- DHAMDHAMA (BARNORIKONA) P.O.- BARBARI DIST- NALBARI ASSAM PIN-781351 VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES 3RD FLOOR JEEVAN DEEP BUILDING SANSAD MARG NEW DELHI-110001 2:THE STATE BAANK OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN CORPORATE CENTRE STATE BANK OF INDIA MADAME CAMA ROAD NARIMAN POINT MUMBAI-40021 AND HAVING ITS LOCAL HEAD OFFICE AT G.S. ROAD GUWAHATI-781005 3:THE ZONAL MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA GUWAHATI ZONE ABC G.S. ROAD BHANGAGARH P.O- DISPUR GUWAHATI-781005 4:THE GENERAL MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA Page No.# 3/4 REGION-I ADMINISTRATIVE UNIT G.S. ROAD BHANGAGARH P.O.- DISPUR GUWAHATI-781005 ------------ Advocate for : MR. B PURKAYASTHA Advocate for : DY.S.G.I. appearing for THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER 10/11/2025 Heard Mr. A K Sahewalla, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. B Purkayastha, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2. 2. The present application has been instituted by the applicants praying for extension of time for compliance with the direction passed by this Court vide order dated 03.09.2025 in WP(C) No. 4154/2025. 3. The applicants have prayed for extension of time by further 3 (three) months for compliance of the said direction. 4. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and also perused the materials brought on record. 5. Although the learned counsel for the respondents has objected to the grant of extension of time to the applicants in the matter, however, considering the projection made that the processing involved could not be taken to its logical conclusion, inasmuch as, the service records of the respondent No. 2 is to be traced out and the same would require some further time. 6. Considering the contention raised in the present Interlocutory Application and also the Page No.# 4/4 objection raised by the learned counsel for the respondents, this Court extends the outer time limit fixed by this Court vide order dated 03.09.2025 in WP(C) No. 4154/2025 for compliance of the direction passed, therein, by another 2 (two) months from today. 7. The respondents shall comply with the direction passed by this Court vide order dated 03.09.2025 within the period of 2 (two) months from today. 8. With the above observation and direction, the present Interlocutory Application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant