GOVIND SAHAI SON OF SHRI MOHAN LAL PUROHIT v. MANGU SON OF SHRI MANGLA (SINCE DECEASED)
CW/12969/2015 · 2025-03-27
Mahendar Kumar Goyal
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24235 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24235 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:14171] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12969/2015
Govind Sahai S/o Shri Mohan Lal Purohit (Since Deceased) through his legal representatives: 1/1 Shiv Kumar Purohit S/o Late Shri Govind Sahai, (Died On 17.12.2018) 1/1/1 Yashvant, Aged About 70 Years, (Wife) 1/1/2 Shalini W/o Gauttam Bhattacharya, Aged About 40 Years, D/o Shiv Kumar Purohit, Resident Of 24, Dhuleshwar Garden, C-Scheme, Jaipur. 1/1/3 Swati W/o Nikhil Sharma, Aged About 42 Years, D/o Shiv Kumar Purohit, Resident Of 24, Dhuleshwar Garden, C-Scheme, Jaipur. 1/2 Lalit Kumar Sharma, S/o Late Shri Govind Sahai 1/3 Dr. Rekha Purohit W/o Late Shri Kailash Chand, Daughter In Law Of Late Shri Govind Sahai 1/4 Sonal Vyas W/o Shri Akhil Vyas, D/o Shri Kailash Chand, Daughter In Law Of Late Shri Govind Sahai 1/5 Smt. Sunita W/o Dr. Kamal Pareek, D/o Late Shri Govind Sahai, Resident Of Plot No. 66, Shiv Shakti Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.) 1/6 Om Prakash Pareek S/o Shri Govind Sharan, Son In Law Late Shri Govind Sahai 1/7 Anil Pareek S/o Shri Om Prakash Pareek, Nawasa Late Shri Govind Sahai Resident Of Plot No. A-417-19, Vidhyut Nagar, Ajmer Road, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus
1. Mangu s/o Shri Mangla (since deceased) (Legal Heirs already taken on record) 1/1 Rewar S/o Late Shri Mangya, 1/2 Chhaju S/o Late Shri Mangya 1/3 Shankar S/o Late Shri Mangya, All are Resident Of Village Gathwada, Tehsil Aamer, District Jaipur. 1/4 Smt. Gulab W/o Sukhram, D/o Late Shri Mangya, Resident Of Village Anantpura, Tehsil Chomu, District Jaipur. 1/5 Smt. Rampyari W/o Shri Sugla D/o Late Shri
[2025:RJ-JP:14171] (2 of 3) [CW-12969/2015] Mangya, Resident Of Village Manpura, Tehsil Amer, District Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Murli S/o Shri Mangla, Village Gathwada, At Present Tehsil Amer, District Jaipur (Died During Pendency Of Writ Petition) Through Legal Heirs- 2/1 Heeralal Sharma S/o Shri Murlidhar Sharma, Resident Of Village Ghatwada, Tehsil Jamwaramgarh, District Jaipur (Raj.)
3. 4. Nand Lal Pareek S/o Shri Dayanand Pareek, Resident Of Plot No. 23, Dhuleshwar Bag, Ajmer Road, Jaipur (Raj.) Ajay Pareek S/o Shri Dayanand Pareek, Resident Of Plot No. 23, Dhuleshwar Bag, Ajmer Road, Jaipur (Raj.)
5. Kunwar Pareek S/o Shri Dayanand Pareek, Resident Of Plot No. 23, Dhuleshwar Bag, Ajmer Road, Jaipur (Raj.)
6. Smt. Krishna W/o Shri Dayanand Pareek, Resident Of Plot No. 23, Dhuleshwar Bag, Ajmer Road, Jaipur (Raj.)
7.
Musmat Mona D/o Dayanand Pareek, Resident Of Hanuman Mandir, In Front Of Haridev Joshi Farm, Sodala, Jaipur (Raj.)
8. Musmat Bala D/o Dayanand Pareek W/o Girij, Resident Of Van Bihar Bhawan, Nahargarh Road, Jaipur (Raj.) ...Plaintiff/Respondents
9. Board Of Revenue, Rajasthan, Ajmer Through Its Registrar. 10. The Sub Divisional Officer, Amer Headquarters, Jaipur. ---Proforma-Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashok Kumar Pareek For Respondent(s) : Mr. Babu Lal Sharma Mr. Akshat Khandelwal for Mr. Himanshu Sogani HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Judgment / Order 27/03/2025
[2025:RJ-JP:14171] (3 of 3) [CW-12969/2015] This writ petition is disposed of in following terms as agreed and requested by learned counsels for the respective parties:
“(1) The order dated 29.07.2015 passed by the Board of Revenue Rajasthan, Ajmer is quashed and set aside. (2) The application filed by Shri Govind Sahai Purohit, the predecessor-in-interest of the present petitioners under
Order 9 Rule 7 CPC stands allowed subject to payment of a cost of Rs.15,000/- by the petitioners in the shape of a demand draft/banker’s cheque in favour of respondent no.2/1-Shri Heeralal Sharma within a period of four weeks from today. (3) The trial Court is requested to expedite proceeding in view of longevity of the suit.” Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J DIKSHA /129