DR. LALIT KUMAR SHARMA S/O DEVKI NANDAN SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/10504/2025 · 2025-07-17
Mahendar Kumar Goyal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24228 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24228 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:26718] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10504/2025 Dr. Lalit Kumar Sharma S/o Devki Nandan Sharma, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Teh Srimadhopur, Mundru, Sikar, Rajasthan,
332712. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Ayurveda (Ayush) Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Ayurveda And Bhartiyachikitsa (Ayush), Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
3. Dy. Secretary, Department Of Ayurveda And Bhartiyachikitsa (Ayush), Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
4. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
5. Director Ayurveda, Directorate Of Ayurveda, Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rishabh Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG with Mr. Vishnu Dutt Sharma and Ms. Kavita Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Order 17/07/2025 Issue notice. Notice is accepted by Shri Bhuwnesh Sharma- learned Additional Advocate General on behalf of the respondents. The petitioner is working as Ayurveda doctor with the respondent-State. He has filed this writ petition seeking benefit of
[2025:RJ-JP:26718] (2 of 2) [CW-10504/2025] enhancement of age of superannuation as has been extended confined to the Allopathic doctors.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the retirement age of the Ayurveda doctors has already been extended from 60 to 62 years and the petitioner would not be retired before attaining the age of 62 years.
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for disposal of this writ petition in terms of assurance extended by the learned counsel for the respondents. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J DIKSHA /49