Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24227 (GAU)

PRANITA DEKA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM and 3 ORS

WP(C)/1537/2017 · 2025-12-17

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010194032017 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1537/2017 PRANITA DEKA D/O. LT. DHARANIDHAR DEKA, VILL. and P.O. DORAKAHARA, P.S. KAMALPUR, MOUZA- MODERTALA, DIST. KAMRUPR, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM and 3 ORS BY THE COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, REVENUE DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY.-06. 2:THE DY. COMMISSIONER KAMRUPR DISTRICT AMINGAON GHY.-781031. 3:THE ADDL. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CUM COMPETENT AUTHORITY UNDER THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA O/O. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KAMRUPR GHY.-31. 4:THE PROJECT DIRECTOR CUM NODAL OFFICER NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA SURAJNAGAR MUKUNDA PATH G.S. ROAD KHANAPARA GHY.-22. Page No.# 2/2 5:PUNJ LLOYED LTD. PROJECT OFFICER GUWAHATI- NALBARI ROAD PROJECT AS04 AT and POST- DEUDUAR CHANGSARI-781101 DIST- KAMRUP ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.A ALI, MR.K LAHAN,MS.A MAHANTA,MS.M KHATUN Advocate for the Respondent : , GA, ASSAM,MR.C BARUAH(SC, N.H.A.I.) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 18.12.2025 Mr. A. Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that he has an instruction to withdraw this writ petition with a liberty to file afresh. Therefore prays for withdrawal. Prayer is allowed. Accordingly, writ petition stands closed on withdrawal with a liberty as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant