LOKESH SHARMA SON OF SHRI ABHAY NATH JI v. THE UNION OF INDIA
CW/10514/2021 · 2025-05-15
Mahendar Kumar Goyal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24226 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24226 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:20596] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10514/2021 Lokesh Sharma Son Of Shri Abhay Nath Ji, Aged About 60 Years, Residing At E-475, Lal Kothi Scheme, Abhay Path, Jaipur -
302015. ----Petitioner Versus
1. The Union Of India, Through Its Secretary, The Department Of Youth Affairs, Government Of India, Room No. 1 C-Wing Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi - 110001.
2. The Principal Secretary, The Department Of Youth Affairs, Government Of Rajasthan Cum Chairman, Youth Hostel Management Committee, Jaipur, Secretariat, Jaipur -
302005.
3. The Deputy Secretary, Youth Hostel Section, Room No. - 102, C-Wing, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi -110001
4. The Deputy Secretary, The Department Of Youth Affairs, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur - 302005.
5. The Assistant Secretary, The Department Of Youth Affairs, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur - 302005.
6. The Zonal Director, Nehru Yuvak Kendra, C/o Nehru Block A 205, Sec-10, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan -
302039.
7. The District Youth Coordinator, Nehru Yuvak Kendra, C/o Nehru Block A 205, Sec-10, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan - 302039.
8. The Member Secretary, The Rajasthan Youth Board, C/o 1St Floor, Sawai Man Singh Stadium, Jaipur - 302005.
9. Smt. Rajni Sharma W/o Shri Gaurav Sharma, C/o Youth Hostel Jaipur, Near High Court Circle, Jaipur - 302005. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Praveen Kumar Jain Ms. Nidhi Khandelwal Ms. Anshu Kanwar Mr. Jai Raj Tantia with Mr. Rohit Tantia
[2025:RJ-JP:20596] (2 of 2) [CW-10514/2021] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Judgment / Order 15/05/2025 On last date, i.e., 13.05.2025, this Court passed the following order:-
“Learned counsels for the respondents have raised a preliminary objection as to maintainability of the writ petition. They submit that the petitioner has an efficacious and alternative remedy before the Central Administrative Tribunal.
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is granted time to complete his instructions. List the matter on 15.05.2025 at top of the list as prayed.” Today, none appears for the petitioner even in the second round. In view thereof, this civil writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Manish/s-231