Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24220 (AP)

P.PARDHA SARADHI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/5526/2024 · 2025-08-05

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010342752024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5526/2024 Between: 1. P.PARDHA SARADHI, S/O.LAKSHMINARAIAH, (A1) AGED 68 YEARS, OCC ARCHAKA, R/O.C/O. B.VENKATA RANGAIAH, JAKKULACHERUVU VILLAGE AND POST, GOOTY MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT 2. P.VENKATA RAMANA @ VENKATA RAMANAIAH,, (A2) S.O. LATE P.V. NARASIMHAIAH, AGED 50 YEARS, OCC ARCHAKA, R/O.TIMMANACHERUVU VILLAGE AND JUTURU POST PEDA GOPPULA MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THROUGH STATION HOUSE OFFICER, GOOTY POLICE STATION, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT, 2. PALUKURI RAVI KUMAR, S/ODESIKACHARYULU, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC ARCHAKA JAKKULACHERUVU VILLAGE AND POST, GOOTY MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court pleased call for the records in connection with F.I.R No.188/2024 of Gooty Police Station, Anantapur District and to quash the same against the petitioners/AI and A2 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. D V SASIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 2. P NAGENDRA REDDY 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Criminal Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short “Cr.P.C.”) has been filed, by the Petitioners/Accused, seeking to quash the Proceedings against them in Crime No.188 of 2024 on the file of the Gooty Police Station, Ananthapuram Police Station. 2. Learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that the subject matter of this Criminal Petition does not survive for adjudication and that the Criminal Petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent/State is in attendance. 4. In that view, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Crl.P.No. 5526 of 2024 06.08.2025 Mjl/*