PADAMCHAND SAINI S/O SHRI DAULATRAM SAINI v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/11794/2019 · 2025-08-26
Mahendar Kumar Goyal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24218 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24218 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:33796] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11794/2019 Padamchand Saini S/o Shri Daulatram Saini, Aged About 69 Years, R/o Ward No. 6, Near Shiv Temple, Tijara, Distt. Alwar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Sinchai Bhawan, J.l.n. Marg, Jaipur.
3. The Assistant Engineer, Water Resources Department, Sub-Division Tijara, District Alwar.
4. The Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Tijara, District Alwar (Raj.)
5. The Director, Pension And Pensioners Welfare Department, Pension Bhawan, Vidhyut Marg, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Saumil Sharma for Mr. Gopal Krishan Sharma, AGC Mr. Shubham Gupta for Mr. Rahul Lodha, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Order 26/08/2025 This writ petition is filed assailing the order of recovery of the excess amount paid to the petitioner on account of wrong fixation and to revise his pay as per the Revised Pay Scale Rules issued from time to time.
[2025:RJ-JP:33796] (2 of 2) [CW-11794/2019]
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the recovery has already been made and the petitioner has been paid benefit of Revised Ray Scale Rules as applicable from time to time and this writ petition is rendered infructuous.
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for disposal of the writ petition in terms thereof. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J PRAGATI/100