Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010152352020 2025:GAU-AS:17151 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4533/2020 DIPENDRA KUMAR SINGHA S/O LATE NILMONI SINGHA RESIDENT OF OIL INDIA LIMITED, MORAN, FIELD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, BUNGALOW NO. D 22 PO MORAN, PS MORANHAT, DIST CHARIADEO,. ASSAM 785669 VERSUS OIL INDIA LTD AND 4 ORS A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT DULIAJAN IN THE DISTRICT OF DIBRUAGARH, ASSAM 786602 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR, AND THE OFFICE OF THE OIL, DULIAJAN, IS BEING MANAGED BY THE RESIDENT CHIEF ENGINEER, OIL DULIAJAN 2:INTERNAL COMPLAINTS COMMITTEE ON THE COMPLAINTS FILED BY MS. SWAPNASMITA SARMA DATED 07.08.2019 AGAINST SRI D K SINGHA OIL INDIA LIMITED PO DULIAJAN DIST DIBRUGARH ASSAM 786602 3:MS. SWAPNASMITA SARMA FIELD ENGG. DEPT.OIL INDIA LTD PO DULIAJAN DIST DIBRUGARH ASSAM 7866602 4:DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER (PERSONNEL) OIL INDIA LIMITED Page No.# 2/4 PO DULIAJAN DIST DIBRUGARH ASSAM 786602 5:THE GENERAL MANAGER (HR) OIL INDIA LIMITED PO DULIAJAN DIST DIBRUGARH ASSAM 78660 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR SISHIR DUTTA, MR. SIDHANT DUTTA Advocate for the Respondent : SC, OIL, MR. K BORUAH(R 3),MRS. S SARMA(R 3),MR. M ALOM(R 3),MS. S GHOSH (R1, R2, R4, R5),MR G K DEKA (R1, R2, R4, R5),MR. C BASUMATARY (R1, R2, R4, R5),MR. K KALITA (R1, R2, R4, R5),MR. M HUSSAIN (R1, R2, R4, R5),S N SARMA (R1, R2, R4, R5) Page No.# 3/4 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 10.12.2025 Heard Ms. S. Mochahari, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of Mr. S. Dutta, learned Senior Counsel, for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. A. Sarma, learned counsel, appearing for the respondent nos.1, 2, 4 & 5 as well as Ms. M. Bhuyan, learned counsel, representing Mr. K. Baruah, learned counsel, appears for the respondent no.3. On the last date of listing, the learned counsel for the respondent nos.1, 2, 3, 4 & 5 had placed on record an order dated 24.05.2021 issued by the disciplinary authority of the petitioner, imposing upon the petitioner a penalty of censure on conclusion of the Departmental proceedings instituted against him. The same having being brought on record an opportunity was granted to the petitioner’s counsel to complete her instructions in the matter. Today, the learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions submits that the petitioner desires not to press this matter any further and accordingly, she prays that she be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition. Prayer is not objected to by the learned counsel for the respondents. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed on Page No.# 4/4 withdrawal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant