APHC010342102025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17483/2025 Between: 1. SANKU GOURI SANKAR, S/O SANKU ANANDA RAO, AGED 30 YEARS, OCCUPATIONSOFTWARE EMPLOYEE, FLAT NO.302, ORCHID ELITE, BESIDE REDDY AVENUE MAIN GATE. NEW BLOCK ROAD, NEAR NIZAMPET GRAM PANCHAYATH OFFICE, MADHURANAGAR,NIZAMPET, MEDCHAL-MALKAJGIRI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS HOME SECRETARY AT A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. SRIKAKULAM - 532001 (A.P.) 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PATHAPATNAM POLICE STATION, PATHAPATNAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT- 532213. (A.P.) ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. B RAMESH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “…..to issue an appropriate Writ or order or a direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declare the action of the Respondent No. 3 in summonning the petitioners orally without there being any matrimonial crime registered against me and my family members in Pathapatnam police station, the Respondent No.3 is hell bent upon coercing and summonning me and my family members to the police station orally, without there being a crime registered against them as illegal, arbitrary and voilative of the procedure established under law, consequently direct the Respondent No. 3 herein not to harass the petitioner and his family members, as the alleged offences are matrimonial in nature, the Respondent No. 3, in voilation of the orders passsed by the Honble Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumar versus state of Bihar, is attempting to extort money from the petitioners by exerting political and police pressure and pass……” 2. Sri B.Ramesh, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that as per the instructions from the party, they wanted to withdraw this Writ Petition. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the submission made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 15.07.2025 MH THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 33 WRIT PETITION NO: 17483/2025 Dt.15.07.2025 MH