[2025:RJ-JP:29892] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8965/2025 Surendra Singh @ Khinnu S/o Tej Singh, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 11 Barau, Police Thana Khetri Nagar, Distt. Jhunjhunu ( Rajasthan) ( Accused At Presently Confined In Khetri) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Omveer Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 04/08/2025 1. This instant application for bail filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the applicant-accused Surendra Singh @ Khinnu S/o Tej Singh in FIR No.19/2025 dated 06.02.2025 registered at P.S. Khetri Nagar, District - Jhunjhunu, whereby the applicant-accused has charged under Section 333, 324(6), 308(2), 351(2), 3(5) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the applicant is innocent and falsely implicated in the present case. Further he submitted that the investigation relating to present applicant-accused is complete and is no more required by the Investigating Agency for investigation. He further assures that in case, the applicant-accused is required for further investigation, the applicant-accused will be available [2025:RJ-JP:29892] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8965/2025] for such investigation. He also submitted that the investigation/trial will take its own time and no purpose will be served by keeping the applicant-accused in custody. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner further submitted that co- accused Sohan and Sonu were released on bail by a Co- ordinate Bench of this Court on 19.02.2025 and case of present petitioner is even on better footings than said accused. He further submitted that police has filed charge- sheet and disposal of trial will take its own time. He further submitted that there is no specific attribution about causing injury is made upon petitioner. 4. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor. 5. Heard learned counsel for the applicant-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record. 6. On the basis of report lodged by complainant Ganga Singh about demand of ransom by Surendra, Sohan and Sonu and further assault with deadly weapons in the night of 06.02.2025, FIR No.19/2025 registered at P.S. Khetri Nagar, Jhunjhunu on 06.02.2025 under Sections 333, 324(6), 308(2), 351(2), 3(5) of BNS. After investigation, this petitioner was arrested and now he is in custody. The police has filed charge-sheet against Sonu, Sohan and Surendra. Two accused Sohan and Sonu were already granted benefit of bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court by order dated 19.02.2025. The criminal antecedent submitted by learned Public Prosecutor indicated 6 more criminal cases were [2025:RJ-JP:29892] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8965/2025] registered against this petitioner at different police station of different districts. 7. Having considered the totality of facts and circumstances of the case particularly criminal background of this petitioner, I am of considered view that this is not a fit case wherein indulgence of bail can be granted only on the basis that two accused were allowed bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. 8. In view of discussion made hereinabove, bail application preferred by petitioner Surendra Singh son of Tej Singh is hereby dismissed. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /335