Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24207 (KAR)

SANTHOSH MANI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY

CRL.P/5335/2022 · 2025-01-27

M G Uma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:3511 CRL.P No. 5335 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5335 OF 2022 BETWEEN: SANTHOSH MANI S/O JAGADISH, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/AT NO.52, SHAMANNA LANE, CHURCH STREET, MURUGESHPALYA, BENGALURU. PIN:560 017 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUNIL P.P, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY JEEVANBHEEMANAGAR POLICE STATION, BENGALURU. REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT COMPLEX, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. SRI. M.R MUDAVI ASSISTANT POLICE COMMISSIONER, CCB, W & N WING, N.T.PETE, BENGALURU-560 002. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. RASHMI PATEL, HCGP FOR R1) Digitally signed by MAYAGAIAH VINUTHA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:3511 CRL.P No. 5335 of 2022 THIS CRL.P. IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS ON THE FILE OF THE X A.C.M.M MAYO HALL, BENGALURU IN C.C.NO.53174/2021 (CR.NO.170/2020) FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE P/U/S 370(3) R/W 34 OF IPC AND SEC.3,4,5,6,7 OF I.T.P ACT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. No representation. 2. The petition is of the year 2022. Matter is listed for the fifth time for compliance of office objections. The order dated 10.12.2024 reads as under: "Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. No representation. The submission of the learned counsel regarding office objection is not accepted. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to comply with the office objections. List this matter, finally, as a last chance, after one week." - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:3511 CRL.P No. 5335 of 2022 3. In spite of that, there is no representation. Office objections are not complied with. The petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. 4. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. SD/- (M G UMA) JUDGE VM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9