ASOMI INDUSTRIES PVT LTD AND ANR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 10 ORS
WP(C)/7494/2018 · 2025-11-27
Devashis Baruah
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24206 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24206 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010238372018
2025:GAU-AS:16485
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/7494/2018 ASOMI INDUSTRIES PVT LTD AND ANR HAVING ITS REGD. OFFICE AND PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS AT ASOMI CAMPUS, H/NO. 32A. B.R. DEKA PATH, N.H 37 (BY PASS), JALUKBARI, GUWAHATI-781014 REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR.
2: SUBHRA JYOTI BHARALI S/O. BHABANANDA BHARALI R/O. LANKESWAR JALUKBARI GUWAHATI-14 AND PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS AT H/NO.32A B.R. DEKA PATH N.H 37 (BY PASS) JALUKBARI GUWAHATI-781014 DIRECTOR OF PETITIONER NO.1 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 10 ORS REP. BY THE COMM. AND SECY., DEPTT. OF HOME, GOVT. OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06.
2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY.
DEPTT. OF LABOUR GOVT. OF ASSAM DISPUR GHY.-06.
3:THE DY. COMMISSIONER NAGAON DISTRICT- NAGAON.
Page No.# 2/3 4:THE ADDL. DY. COMMISSIONER (I/C) KALIABOR SUB-DIVISION NAGAON.
5:THE SUPDT. OF POLICE NAGAON DIST. NAGAON.
6:THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER (CIVIL) KALIABOR SUB-DIVISION KALIABOR DIST. NAGAON.
7:THE ASSTT. LABOUR COMMISSIONER NAGAON DIST. NAGAON.
8:THE COMMISSIONER CUM SECRETARY ASSAM TEA ESTATE EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION NIDHI BHAWAN BASISTHA LALMATI GUWAHATI-29.
9:THE LABOUR INSPECTOR CUM CONCILIATION OFFICER KALIABOR NAGAON.
10:THE ASSAM CHAH MAZDOOR SANGHA SECONEE TEA ESTATE TETULGURI JAKHALABANDHA NAGAON REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT.
11:THE PRESIDENT ASSAM CHACH MAZDOR SANGHA NAGAON BRANCH SALNA NAGAON
Page No.# 3/3 For the petitioner (s) : None appears
For the respondent (s) : Ms. U. Das, Addl. Sr. Advocate
BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH O R D E R
28.11.2025
None appears on behalf of the petitioners on call.
2. It is also seen that instead of various directions being issued by the Lawazima Court to take steps upon the respondent Nos.10 & 11, the petitioners have not taken any steps. It therefore appears that the petitioners have lost interest in the instant proceedings.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed for non- prosecution.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant