( 1 ) 44 WP 13992 OF 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 44 WRIT PETITION NO. 13992 OF 2025 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3585 OF 2026 IN WP/13992/2025 VISHWANATH LAXMANRAO RENEWAD VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 5855 OF 2025 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4539 OF 2026 IN WP/5855/2025 SHRIHARI SHANKARRAO KOLI KAMBLE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 13995 OF 2025 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3581 OF 2026 IN WP/13995/2025 HANMANLU GAJENNA KARBALWAD VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 13996 OF 2025 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3584 OF 2026 IN WP/13996/2025 AVINASH RAMKISHAN PAKALWAD VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... 2026:BHC-AUG:30636-DB ( 2 ) 44 WP 13992 OF 2025 Mr. C. R. Thorat, Advocate for the Petitioners Mr. S. R. Yadav – Lonikar, AGP for Respondent/State Mr. B. B. Bhise, Advocate for Respondents/Zilla Parishad … CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT AND AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, JJ. DATE : 22.07.2026 PER COURT :- . Writ Petition No.13451 of 2025 and Civil Application No.3580 of 2026 are not on board. Taken on board. 2. Considering the prayers and reliefs sought in the Petitions, this Court finds that the Petitions can be conveniently disposed off. 3. This Court in Writ Petition Nos.303/2025, 266/2025 and 1375/2025 has already passed the order. Both the parties accept to the said position. 4. It is the case of the Petitioners that the proposal of tribe validity certificate is still pending with the Scrutiny Committee. Pending said proposal, the Petitioner stood super-annuated. The State Government by Government Resolution dated 14.12.2022 created supernumerary posts in respect of such of the Government employees who have faced invalidation, directing them to be transferred to such supernumerary posts and they have been held entitled ( 3 ) 44 WP 13992 OF 2025 to have all the pensionary benefits. However, they are not entitled to benefit of promotion and the policy of compassionate appointment. 5. In said orders, this Court further relied upon two judgments whereby such employees were permitted not to press their proposals before the Scrutiny Committee and a direction was issued extending all the pensionary benefits. 6. In view of the above, the Petitions stand disposed off with following order :- a. The Petitioners shall file affidavit before the Scrutiny Committee and the Committee shall permit them not to press the proposals within two weeks. b. On such compliance being made the Respondent/Zilla Parishad shall process Petitioners’ pension papers and extend all the pensionary benefits. 7. Pending Civil Applications, if any, stand disposed of. ( AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. ) ( KISHORE C. SANT, J. ) PRW