Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 242 (UTT)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND v. NARENDRA SINGH PARIHAR

SPLA/286/2025 · 2026-03-24

Ashish Naithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS SPLA No.286 of 2025 With (Delay Condonation Appl. No.01 of 2025) In GA No.98 of 2025 State of Uttarakhand Vs. Narendra Singh Parihar Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. Vikas Uniyal, learned AGA for the State. 2. Mr. Gaurav Nagpal and Mr. Amit Tyagi, learned counsel for the Respondent. 3. It is a Government appeal and there is delay condonation application, paper no.1, wherein 114 days’ delay has been shown. 4. The grounds for delay as shown by the State is procedural lapse whereas the delay condonation application has been opposed by the respondent on the ground that the reason, so assigned, does not meet the limitation condition. 5. This Court finds that the reasons, so assigned by the State, are sufficient to allow the delay condonation application. Delay is condoned. Accordingly, delay condonation application is allowed. 6. Present leave to appeal is filed by the State/appellant against the impugned judgment and order dated 26.05.2025 passed by learned Special Judge (N.D.P.S. Act), District Dehradun in Special Session Trial No.15 of 2015 State vs. Narendra Singh Parihar under Section 8/20 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act. 7. After hearing learned State counsel the grounds are found to be sufficient at this juncture to grant leave. 8. Leave is granted. 9. Summon the lower court record. 10. After receipt of the lower court record, let the paper book be prepared and supplied to the concerned parties, as per Rules. 11. Let the objection be filed by the respondent within two weeks. 12. List this appeal on 06.05.2026. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 24.03.2026 Arti