2025:HHC:23130 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA COPC No. 544 of 2023 Decided on : 17.07.2025 Arun Kumar. …Petitioner Versus Ramesh Kumar. …Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Y.P. Sood, Advocate. Petitioner in person. For the respondent : Mr. Goldy Kumar, Advocate. Respondent in person. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) These are contempt proceedings, in which on the last date of hearing, the following order was passed:- “The parties are present in the Court. They submit that let Tehsildar concerned, i.e. Tehsildar, Hamirpur, visit the spot and identify and fix the boundary of the path to which the parties are entitled to in terms of the partition proceedings carried out between the parties and the passage shown in the Tatima which forms part 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:23130 of the mutation which was subsequently attested pursuant to the partition proceedings. As the prayer made by the parties seems to be reasonable, Tehsildar, Hamirpur, is directed to do the needful in the presence of the parties and Tehsildar otherwise shall be within his powers to have the matter amicably settled between the parties as may be agreeable to both the parties. Either of the parties shall apprise the Tehsildar concerned of the orders passed by the Court and who will visit the site after due intimation to the parties and thereafter, needful be done before the next date of hearing. As prayed for, list on 17.07.2025. On the next date of hearing, the parties to remain present in the Court.” 2. Today the parties are present in person. The Court stands informed that the site was visited by the Tehsildar in terms of the previous order and thereafter, whatever obstructions were there on the property in issue, stand removed. The petitioner and the respondent have expressed their satisfaction with regard to the spot situation qua the passage, as it exists today and they also assure the Court that none will create any impediment thereto. 3 2025:HHC:23130 3. In the light of these developments, these proceedings are closed. Notice discharged. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 17, 2025 (Shivank Thakur)