Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24193 (GAU)

HABIBUR RAHMAN AND 2 ORS. v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

AB/1687/2025 · 2025-10-28

Shamima Jahan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010151912025 2025:GAU-AS:14526 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1687/2025 HABIBUR RAHMAN AND 2 ORS. SON OF LATE SIKANDER ALI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DALONI JURIA,P.O. TINSUKIA, DIST.NAGAON, ASSAM, PIN 782124 2: EJAJUL HOQUE SON OF HABIBUR RAHMAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DALONI JURIA P.O. TINSUKIA DIST.NAGAON ASSAM PIN-782124 3: MUKTAR HUSSAIN SON OF JONAB ALI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DALONI JURIA P.O. TINSUKIA DIST.NAGAON ASSAM PIN 78212 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : DARAK ULLAH, S BEGUM,MS A HUSSAIN,SABRISH AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN ORDER Date : 29.10.2025 1. Heard Mr. S Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P.S Lahkar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam. 2. By this application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 the petitioner has sought for pre-arrest bail in connection with Juria P.S Case No 133/2025 registered under Section 303(2)/317(2) of the BNS, 2023 R/W Section 11 of Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960. 3. The FIR dated 13.05.2025 reveals that on an information that the accused persons have stolen cows, the police personnel reached the place of occurrence and upon reaching, found that the thieves had already fled the scene leaving behind 4 nos. of cows as the local people screamed and gathered at the scene. It was further stated in the FIR that on local enquiry, the accused persons were identified and all the three petitioners were recognized as the thieves. 4. It is noticed that the petitioners were released on bail vide order dated 26.08.2025 with the condition that they shall appear before the I/O within a period of 7(seven) days from the date of the order and in compliance of the said directions, it is noticed that the petitioners had appeared before the I/O and got their statements recorded. Page No.# 3/3 5. In view of the same, this Court deems it fit that the order dated 26.08.2025, by which the petitioners were granted interim bail, may be made absolute with the further direction that the petitioners may comply with the already mentioned directions in the said order. 6. Petition is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant