Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010270332025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./3988/2025 BISWAJIT DOLEY AND 3 ORS. S/O RAJ DOLEYR/O CHETIA GAON, WARD NO. 5, P.O. AND P.S. LAKHIMPUR DIST. NORTH LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM 2: MOHAN BORA S/OLT. PARESH BORA R/O DABA FIELD P.O. AND P.S. SIVASAGAR DIST. SIVASAGAR ASSAM 3: INJAMAMUL HAQUE S/O NUR ISLAM ALI R/O MAROWI P.O.A N DP.S. SIPAJHAR DIST. DARRANG ASSAM 4: NITU AHMED S/OLATE MOJNUR ALI R/O TOWN ENTRY ROAD P.S. RANGIA DIST. KAMRUP ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM Page No.# 2/3 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S MUNIR, MR. S HAQUE,MS S ABDULLAH Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER Date : 28 .01. 2026 Heard Mr. S. Munir, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. D.P. Goswami, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam for the State respondent. This application has been filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 by the petitioners namely, (1) Biswajit Doley, (2) Mohan Bora, (3) Injamul Haque and (4) Nitu Ahmed, seeking regular bail in connection with Dispur P.S. Case No. 875/2025 under Sections 140(2)/ 3(5) of BNS, 2023 added Section 308(2) of 2023. It is submitted that this is a second bail application. The earlier bail application was rejected by this Court vide order dated 26.11.2025, passed in B.A. No. 3599/2025. The petitioner was arrested on 27.10.2025. The case was registered on the basis of the ejahar dated 27.10.2025 lodged by one Rahul Mishra. The gist of allegation is that while he was attending to his wife at Partiksha Hospital, some person in a black Scorpio vehicle kidnapped him for ransom and he came to know the identity of two persons being Riaj Ahmed and Chinmoy. It is alleged that after kidnapping he was physically and mentally abused and threatened with his wife for ransom and while being in confinement, he was forced to transfer some money through one of his known persons. It is Page No.# 3/3 stated that during his confinement, he could share his location whereupon he was rescued by police and families. The case diary was called for. However, it is submitted by the learned Add. P.P. that in the meantime, report in the final form being CS. No. 6978/2025, dated 30.10.2025 has been submitted. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has objected the prayer for bail. In view of the completion of investigation and considering the detention of 95 days, it would be fair to grant the bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners shall be allowed to go on regular bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 50,000/- each with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned concerned court. The direction for bail is further subject to the condition(s) that the accused-petitioners - (1) shall cooperate with the trial of the case, if one commences;. (2) shall not hamper or tamper with the evidences of the case; and (3) shall not try to influence any witnesses and commit any illegal activities. Violation of breach of condition (s) shall entail cancelation of the bail. The bail application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant