(1) 925 CP-751.2022.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 751 OF 2022 IN WP/5781/2021 UMESH SIDRAM DHOTE VERSUS VARSHA D. THAKUR GHUGE THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND OTHERS … Mr. N.S. Shah, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr Yogesh Bolkar, Advocate holding for Ms. P.V. Diggikar, Advocate for respondent No.1. … CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, JJ. DATED : 1 JULY 2025 ORDER:- 1. By filing affidavit in reply and placing relevant documents on record, the respondents have contended that the order of which contempt is claimed, is complied with. 2. We accept the said statement and dispose of the contempt petition as the order is complied with. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI) JUDGE JUDGE VD_Dhirde