1 / 2 2025:CGHC:23987 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2845 of 2025 S.K.S Ispat Power Limited A Registered Company Under The Companies Act 1956, Having Its Office At, Siltara Industrial Growth Centre, Phase- II, 18th Mile Stone, Bilaspur Road, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Through Its Authorised Signatory Shri Gopal Garg ... Petitioner versus 1 - South Eastern Coalfields Limited Through Its Chairman Cum Managing Director, Having Office At SECL Bhawan, Seepat Road, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh- 495006 2 - South Eastern Coalfields Limited Through Its General Manager, Marketing And Sales, Having Office At SECL Bhawan, Seepat Road, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh- 495006 ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Ankit Singhal, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Pankaj Singh, Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma) Order on Board 13/06/2025 1. Petitioner has preferred this writ petition primarily for quashment of the impugned Compensation Bill dated 09/09/2019, raised by the Respondent, demanding an amount of Rs.1,56,44,227.60/- on the ASHUTOSH MISHRA Digitally signed by ASHUTOSH MISHRA Date: 2025.06.17 12:26:32 +0530 2 / 2 ground of short lifting of Coal during Financial Year 2014-15, in view of the fact that the minimum threshold quantity under Clause 4.5 of the FSA had been met by the petitioner and in alternative the petitioner has sought appropriate direction towards the respondent authorities to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 31/01/2025. 2. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner would confine his prayer to direct the respondent authorities to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 31/01/2025. 3. Learned counsel for the Respondents would submit that the respondents are ready to decide the representation of the petitioner, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall keep the bank guarantee alive. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is ready to keep the bank guarantee alive. 5. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction that the respondent authorities shall decide the pending representation of the petitioner expeditiously, in accordance with law, on its own merits. SD/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE ashu