Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24179 (GAU)

DHANIRAM NARAH v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS

WP(C)/6777/2025 · 2025-12-02

Devashis Baruah

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010260942025 2025:GAU-AS:16637 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6777/2025 DHANIRAM NARAH S/O.- LATE PARAMANANDA NARAH, A PERMANENT R/O VILL. WARD NO. 5, CHETIA GAON, P.O. , P.S. NORTH LAKHIMPUR, DIST. LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT HOUSE NO. 9, GOVT. PRESS ROAD, BAMUNIMAIDAM, GUWAHATI- 701021 IN THE DIST OF KAMRUP METRO, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIAPAL SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, COOPERATIVE DEPTT., DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 06. 2:THE REGISTRAR COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES ASSAM KHANAPARA GUWAHATI-22. 3:THE OFFICER ON MANAGEMENT CUM LIQUIDATOR ASOM BOHUMUKHI SAMABAI SAMITTEE LTD. ASISH NAGAR TARAJAN A.T. ROAD JORHAT-785001. 4:THE SECRETARY/ CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR ASOM BOHUMUKHI SAMABAI SAMITTEE LTD. ASISH NAGAR TARAJAN A.T. ROAD JORHAT-785001. Page No.# 2/3 5:THE BRANCH MANAGER ASOM BOHUMUKHI SAMABAI SAMITTEE LTD. BOGINADI BRANCH DIST. LAKHIMPUR C/O- ASISH NAGAR TARAJAN A.T. ROAD JORHAT-785001 For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. G.G. Gogoi, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Ms. M.D. Borah, Standing Counsel BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER Date : 03.12.2025 Heard Mr. G.G. Gogoi, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Ms. M.D. Borah, the learned Standing Counsel appears on behalf of the Cooperation Department. 2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that as the Disputes Redressal Commission, Lakhimpur, North Lakhimpur is already taking steps in pursuance to the order dated 03.03.2023 in C.P. Case No. 2/2018, the petitioner herein would not like to further pursue the instant writ petition, rather, if necessary the petitioner would invoke the provisions of Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, if so required. Page No.# 3/3 3. Taking into account the above, the instant writ petition stands closed on withdrawal. 4. The closure of the instant writ petition, however, shall not prejudice the petitioner in any proceedings initiated for compliance to the order dated 03.03.2023 in C.P. Case No. 2/2018. JUDGE Comparing Assistant