APHC010341762025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17348/2025 Between: 1. GUNDA VENKATA PITCHA RAO,, S/O.DAIVADHEENAM, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, BUSINESS, R/O.4-22-65, 4TH LINE, MUTYALA REDDY NAGAR, AMARAVATHI ROAD, GUNTUR ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY. ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, LALAPET POLICE STATION, GUNTUR. 4. KOTHAMASU PUMA CHANDRA RAO, S/O. VENKATESWARLU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS. BUSINESS, R/O..3-29-3/13, 3RD LINE, KRISHNA NAGAR, GUNTUR 5. MEDA SATYANARAYANA, S/O SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, BUSINESS, R/O D.NO.4-5-49/37/B/1, NEAR NAME TOWERS, SAI BABA ROAD. RING ROAD, GUNTUR. 6. GUNDA MANISEKHARARAO, S/O.DAIVADHEENAM, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS BUSINESS,CHOTRADOWN,WURAVAVARI STREET, GUNTUR. 7. GUNDA DHANALAKSHMI, W/O.MANI SEKHARA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS BUSINESS,CHOTRADOWN,WURAVAVARI STREET GUNTUR ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No.2 and 3 harassing the Petitioner by calling the police station and day in and day out. On the pretext of mediation, the police are giving pressure to petitioner by filing false complaints given by 6th and 7th 2 Respondents. Even though having knowledge of the matter is pertaining to civil in nature they are unnecessarily involving in the civil matter, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NANDA KISHORE KONDURI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “ .... to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No.2 and 3 harassing the Petitioner by calling the police station and day in and day out. On the pretext of mediation, the police are giving pressure to petitioner by filing false complaints given by 6th and 7th Respondents. Even though having knowledge of the matter is pertaining to civil in nature they are unnecessarily involving in the civil matter, and pass ...” 2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents on Written Instructions dated 14.07.2025 would submit that petitioner was called by respondent No.3 for preliminary enquiry but the petitioner did not turn up to respondent No.4-Police Station. 3. Relevant Paragraph of the written instructions reads as under: “ .... 3rd respondent called the petitioner for preliminary enquiry in the 6th respondent PGRS petition only. Further the 2nd and 3rd respondent neither harass the petitioner nor put any pressure upon the petitioner to compromise with the unofficial respondents in civil matters.” 4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of. 3 5. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 17348 of 2025 22.07.2025 Mjl /*