[2025:RJ-JP:28845] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8880/2025 Siyaram S/o Shree Rajendra @ Raju, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Baas Banjara, Village Dundpuri, Police Station Tehla, District Alwar, (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ghanshyam Singh Rathore with Mr. Kirti Vardhan Singh Rathore & Mr. Santosh Singh Shakhawat For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP Mr. Vikram Singh HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 30/07/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.104/2025 registered at Police Station Tehla, District Alwar (Rajasthan) for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109(1) & 3(5) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that though there is allegation against the petitioner to cause firearm injury on the head of the injured Prem Devi but medical report suggests that there is no gunshot injury on the person of the injured Prem Devi. Counsel submits that other injured namely Makkhan Singh has sustained gunshot injury on the right middle finger and same has been opined as grievous in nature. Counsel submits that [2025:RJ-JP:28845] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8880/2025] petitioner and complainant both are from the same family and alleged incident took place in the spur of moment. Counsel further submits that there are no criminal antecedents of the petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 27.05.2025 and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for the complainant vehemently opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for both the parties, as also the material made available on record in the form of case diary; nature of injuries; absence of criminal antecedents of the petitioner; period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner -Siyaram S/o Shree Rajendra @ Raju shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. [2025:RJ-JP:28845] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8880/2025] 7. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /320