Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:79774 Court No. - 66 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7313 of 2025 Applicant :- Rajnath Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ghan Shyam Das Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Vijay Kumar Mishra Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J. 1. None appeared on behalf of the informant even in the revised call. 2. Heard Sri Kamal Krishna, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Ghanshyam Das, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Vijay Kumar , learned AGA-I, for the State. 3. The instant bail application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 103 of 2024, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 323, 325, 427, 504 and 506 IPC, Police Station Barsathi, District Jaunpur during pendency of the trial. 4. Learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that on the basis of false allegation, applicant has been roped in the present matter along with as many as 10 others including co-accused Manoj Kumar Yadav and Jay Kumar Yadav and both the above co-accused have been released on bail by this Court. 5. He further submits that co-accused Manoj Kumar Yadav has been released on bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 18.11.2024 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 37881 of 2024 while co-accused Jay Kumar Yadav has been released on bail by this Court vide order dated 06.03.2025 passed in Criminal Misc.Bail Application No. 7996 of 2025 and on facts case of applicant is exactly at par with them. 6. He further submits, applicant is not having any criminal history and in the present matter she is in jail since 15.1.2025. 7. Per contra, learned AGA although opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the argument on facts advanced by learned counsel for the applicant. 8. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case. 9. Considering the argument advanced by learned counsel for the applicant and the fact that similarly placed co-accused Manoj Kumar Yadav and Jay Kumar Yadav have already been released on bail by this Court and applicant is not having any criminal history and in the present matter he is in jail since 15.1.2025, in my view, applicant is entitled to be released on bail. 10. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant bail application is allowed. 11. Let the applicant-Rajnath Yadav be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the dates fixed, unless her personal presence is exempted. (ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal and anti-social activity. 12. In case of breach of any of the above condition, the prosecution will be at liberty to move an application before this Court for cancellation of the bail of the applicant. 13. It is clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the facts brought in by the parties pertaining to the disposal of bail application and the said observations shall have no bearing on the merits of the case during trial. Order Date :- 15.5.2025 SKM Digitally signed by :- SHRAVANA KUMAR MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad