APHC010341662018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1309/2018 Between: N.chakrapani ...PETITIONER AND Sri P Rajagopal ...CONTEMNOR Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N INDRASENA REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER The above contempt case is filed complaining non-implementation of the order dated 10.04.2017 in W.P.No.12537 of 2017. 2. The said writ petition was filed to declare the action of 4th respondent in not mutating the name of petitioner and not issuing title deed and e-pass book, as illegal and arbitrary. The said writ petition was disposed of on 10.04.2017. The operative portion of the order reads thus: “Since the application of the petitioner dated 14.02.2017 is stated to be pending before the 4th respondent, without going into the merits of the case, the 4th respondent is directed to dispose of the said application, in accordance with law, within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order” 3. A counter affidavit was filed by the respondent. In the counter affidavit, it was specifically contended the petitioner’s application dated 14.02.2017 was disposed of on 18.02.2017 itself and the same was communicated to the petitioner through his registered mobile number. The application of petitioner was rejected on 18.02.2017 with a remark that the land is AWD land and hence, rejected. Copy of the said endorsement has been filed along with counter affidavit. 4. A perusal of the averments in the counter affidavit would disclose that the petitioner made an application on 14.02.2017, which was rejected on 18.02.2017 and the same was communicated to the petitioner through his registered mobile number. 5. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court does not find any violation of order dated 10.04.2017 in W.P.No.12537 of 2017. 6. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is Closed. No costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI PVD