Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24161 (KAR)

SARVASHREE POOJARTHI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/13814/2024 · 2025-07-10

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25151 WP No. 13814 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 13814 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SARVASHREE POOJARTHI AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS, W/O LATE GIRIYA POOJARY 2. CHANDRASHEKARA POOJARY AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, S/O LATE GIRIYA POOJARY, PETITIONER NO.1 AND 2 ARE RESIDING AT: UMMAKKINAILU, KARKADA VILLAGE – 576 104 SALIGRAMA POST, BRAHMAVARA TALUK. (THE PETITIONER NO.1 BEING A PERSON OF UNSOUND MIND REPRESENTED BY HER SON/GUARDIAN CHANDRASHEKARA POOJARY(PETITIONER NO.2) …PETITIONERS (BY SRI K.CHANDRANATH ARIGA, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25151 WP No. 13814 of 2024 AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED HEREIN BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, UDUPI DISTRICT, RAJATHADRI, MANIPAL POST – 576 104 UDUPI TALUK. 2. THE REVENUE INSPECTOR KOTA HOBLI, SALIGRAMA POST – 576 104 BRAHMAVARA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT. 3. THE VILLAGE ACCOUNTANT KARKADA VILLAGE – 576 104 SALIGRAMA POST BRAHMAVARA TALUK. 4. THE SALIGRAMA PATTANA PANCHAYATH SALIGRAMA POST – 576 104 SALIGRAMA, BRAHMAVARA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF OFFICER. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI NEELAKANTAPPA PUJAR, HCGP FOR R1 TO R3) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25151 WP No. 13814 of 2024 THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A) CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN O.S 68/2024 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDAPURA; B) SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 15/04/2024 PASSED BY THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDAPURA IN OS NO. 68/2024 ON IA NO. 49 (ANNEXURE-J). THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition. 2. The memo reads as follows: “MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL The Petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the above writ petition with liberty to file fresh Petition as and when the cause of action arises.” In terms of the memo, the writ petition is disposed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE NVJ/List No.: 2 Sl No.: 6