BASHIR ANSARI ALIAS BASIR ANSARI ALIAS BASIR v. STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./5002/2025 · 2025-09-01
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24161 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24161 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:26509
--1-- A.B.A. No. 5002 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 5002 of 2025
----
1. Bashir Ansari @ Basir Ansari @ Basir, aged about 25 years, son of Samsuddin Mian
2. Nashir Ansari @ Nasir Ansari @ Nasir, aged about 30 years, son of Samsuddin Mian
3. Iqbal Ansari @ Akbal Ansari @ Akbal, aged about 39 years, son of Samsuddin Mian
4. Dilesh Ansari, aged about 23 years, son of Salim Miyan
5. Izrail Ansari @ Md. Esral Ansari @ Izrail, aged about 35 years, son of Majid Miyan
6. Israil Ansari, aged about 36 years, son of Salim Miyan
7. Iqrar Ansari @ Md. Ikrar Ansari, aged about 24 years, son of Majid Miyan All are resident of village – Nagadari, PO and PS – Karon, District - Deoghar
.... Petitioners -- Versus --
The State of Jharkhand
.... Opposite Party
----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
---
For the Petitioners :- Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocate
For the State
:- Mr. Prabir Kr. Chatterjee, Advocate
---- 02/01.09.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Karon P.S. Case No.23 of 2025, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 127(2), 132, 121(1), 121(2), 262, 263, 109, 351(3) and 352 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,
2025:JHHC:26509
--2-- A.B.A. No. 5002 of 2025
2023 pending in the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhupur.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that allegations are made that 200 persons were assembled and there are 14 named persons for the alleged occurrence. He submits that there are general and omnibus allegation against all the accused persons and 8 of the co-accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail in ABA Nos.4058 of 2025, 4116 of 2025, 2930 of 2025, 2980 of 2025. He submits that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.9 of the petition.
4.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of entering into scuffle with the police and in view of that the anticipatory bail of the petitioners may kindly be rejected.
5. Considering that the allegations are made against 200 unknown persons and 40 persons are named in the FIR prima facie it appears that there are general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners and the other co-accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail in ABA Nos.4058 of 2025, 4116 of 2025, 2930 of 2025, 2980 of 2025 and the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.9 of the petition, I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
6. Accordingly, the petitioners, above named, are hereby
directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks
2025:JHHC:26509
--3-- A.B.A. No. 5002 of 2025
from today, and in the event of their surrender/arrest, the petitioners, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhupur in connection with Karon P.S. Case No.23 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,
2023.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Sangam/