Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010233012025 2025:GAU-AS:15153 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./3424/2025 VICKEY PURUSHOTTAMAN SON OF LATE NANU SARADA PURUSHOTTAMAN VILLAGE- UDIANA P.S. - RANGIA DISTRICT - KAMRUP (ASSAM) VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP,ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MS G DEKA, MS M DEB Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Page No.# 2/4 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA ORDER 10.11.2025 1. Heard Ms. G. Deka, learned counsel for the accused applicant. Also heard Mr. K.K. Parasar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. This application under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 has been filed by the accused applicant, namely, Vickey Purushottaman, praying for grant of bail in connection with Rangia P.S Case No.199/2025 registered under Sections 118(2)/109/61(2) of BNSS, 2023, R/W Sections 25(1)(A)/27 of Arms Act, 1959. 3. The allegation against the accused applicant in the FIR is that he along with another person while riding on motorcycle tried to shot at one Saidul Ali and thereby, tried to kill him. 4. The accused applicant was arrested on 30.08.2025. After investigation, the police has recovered 8 rounds of bullets, 2 magazines and one country-made pistol from the house and premises of one Rupjan Bibi. 5. The learned counsel for the accused applicant submits that Page No.# 3/4 all the arms and ammunition alleged to be involved in the instant case, have already been recovered by the police and that the accused applicant has already been in jail for last 73 days. Therefore, she submits that the accused applicant should be granted bail, looking into his long detention in judicial custody. 6. On the other hand, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State submits that there are incriminating materials against the accused applicant and that the arms were recovered from the house and premises of aforesaid Rupjan Bibi on his disclosure. Therefore, looking into the existence of these materials against the accused applicant, this Court should not allow him to go on bail at this stage. 7. This Court has gone through the materials available in the case diary as well as heard the submissions made by the respective counsel appearing for the parties. 8. After considering the entire facts of the case, taking into account that the alleged weapons have already been recovered, the complainant who was injured, has already recovered and taking into account his long detention of 73 days in judicial custody, this Court is of the opinion that the above-named accused applicant shall be released forthwith from jail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.30,000/- Page No.# 4/4 (Rupees Thirty Thousand only) only with one surety of like nature subject to the satisfaction of the Court of learned SDJM(M), Rangia with following conditions: (i) That the accused applicant shall co-operate with the investigation as and when required; (ii) That the accused applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person who may be acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing such facts of the case before the Investigating Officer; (iii) That the accused applicant shall not hamper or tamper with evidence. 9. In view of the aforesaid, this bail application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant