1 APHC010340912025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17274/2025 Between: 1. K. SUHRAMANYAM,, S/O. K. RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. CHITTECHERLA VILLAGE AND POST, CHINNAGOTTIGALLU MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 2. K. CHINNAPAPA,, W/O. K. SUBRAMANYAM, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. CHITTECHERLA VILLAGE AND POST, CHINNAGOTTIGALLU MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 3. K. PRAVEEN,, S/O. K. SUBRAMANYAM, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. CHITTECHERLA VILLAGE AND POST, CHINNAGOTTIGALLU MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 4. K. CHARAN,, S/O. K.SUBRAMANYAM, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. CHITTECHERLA VILLAGE AND POST, CHINNAGOTTIGALLU MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 3. SUB DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, CHANDRAGIRI, TIRUPATI 2 DISTRICT. 4. INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PILER RURAL CIRCLE OFFICER, BHAKARAPET, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 5. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BHAKARAPET POLICE STATION, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 6. KOMMALAKALVA KRISHNAIAH, S/O. CHENGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. CHITTECHERLA VILLAGE AND POST, CHINNAGOTTIGALLU MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 7. KOMMALAKALVA MALLESWARA, S/O. K. KRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. CHITTECHERLA VILLAGE AND POST, CHINNAGOTTIGALLU MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents No. 1 to 5 particularly the 5th respondent at the instance of 6th and 7th respondents in calling the petitioners to police station and insisting the petitioners to sit in police station from morning to evening without register any crime against the petitioners and insisting the petitioners to yield the terms of 6th and 7th respondents in order to settle the civil dispute in between the petitioners with the 6th and 7th respondents pertaining to petitioners agricultural landed properly admeasuring with an extent of Ac. 0.59 cents Covered by survey No. 349/e and same was situated at Chittencherla Village in Chinnagottigallu Mandal of Tirupati District and without there being any authority or sanction of law and declare the same as highly illegal, arbitrary, Capricious Manner and unconstitutional and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 5th respondent not to interfere in any manner with petitioners personal life and liberty IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to 3 direct the respondents, particularly 5th respondent not to insist petitioners to appear before his authority nor interfere in any manner with petitioners peaceful possession and enjo5anent over agricultural landed property admeasuring with an extent of Ac. 0.59 cents Covered by survey No. 349/e and same was situated at Chittencherla Village in Chinnagottigallu Mandal of Tirupati District, in the interest of Justice, in pending disposal of the main Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. MUCHAKAYALA NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, appearing for the respondents 1 to 5. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that police are calling the petitioners to the police station and insisted them to sit in the police station for the whole day without there being any case registered against them. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that basing on the complaint made by respondent No.7, police have called the petitioners to the police station and after verifying the record, they realized that it is a matter of civil in nature. As such, no criminal case has been registered against the petitioners and police never interfered in the civil dispute. 4 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that recording the same, the writ petition may be disposed of. 5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 14.07.2025 ARR 5 187 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17274/2025 Dt.14.07.2025 ARR