SHUSHANT KUMAR MISHRA ALIAS SUSHANT KR MISHRA ALIAS PINTOO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./13/2025 · 2025-01-08
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2415 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2415 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No.13 of 2025
------
1. Shushant Kumar Mishra @ Sushant Kr. Mishra @ Pintoo
2. Kaustubh Bhardwaj
.... .... …. Petitioners
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioners : Mr. Lukesh Kumar, Advocate
Md. Faiyaj Alam, Advocate
For the State
: Ms. Kumari Rashmi, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated-08-01-2025
Heard the parties.
Apprehending their arrest in connection with Godda (Town) P.S. Case No.207 of 2024 instituted under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 76, 79, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3), 324(2) and 324(3) of the B.N.S., 2023, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners outraged the modesty of the informant and snatched her ornament. It is next submitted that the only allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners assaulted the husband of the informant but there is no injury sustained by the husband of the informant. It is also submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-14 of the instant anticipatory bail application, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent. It is further submitted that the petitioners undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of her family members in any manner during the pendency of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners undertake to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned Addl.P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrendering, they will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.10,000/- as cash security each and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M, Godda in connection with Godda (Town) P.S. Case No.207 of 2024 with the condition that they will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the pendency of the case and they will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of her family members in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/