- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19934 WP No. 11441 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 11441 OF 2025 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: 1. MR RAJESH SETHURAMAN S/O LATE S SETHURAMAN, AGED 52 YEARS, RESIDING AT FLAT NO.201, MEENAKSHI MANAR, 5TH CROSS, 10TH MAIN, JAYANAGAR 1ST BLOCK, BANGALORE, KARNATAKA- 560 011 2. MRS. ANURADHA RAJESH W/O MR. RAJESH SETHURAMAN, AGED 48 YEARS, FLAT NO.201, MEENAKSHI MANAR, 5TH CROSS, 10TH MAIN, JAYANAGAR 1ST BLOCK, BANGALORE, KARNATAKA- 560 011. … PETITIONERS (BY MS. SANDHYA U PRABHU., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. M/S EDELWEISS ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY LTD ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS TRUSTEE OF EARC TRUST, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER, Digitally signed by VIDYA G R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19934 WP No. 11441 of 2025 MR.K.RADHAKRISHNAN NAIR, OFFICE AT ELELWEISS HOUSE, 1ST FLOOR, OFF CST ROAD, KALINA, MUMBAI- 400 098 … RESPONDENT (BY SRI. VIJAY S., ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE HON'BLE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL II BANGALORE TO CONSIDER THE APPLICATION FOR MODIFICATION DTD. 14.04.2025 SEEKING AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR MAKING PAYMENT OF RS. 40,00,000/- (RUPEES FORTY LAKHS ONLY) AS A 2ND PART OF THE INTERIM ORDER GRANTED BY HON'BLE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL II AT BANGALORE IN S.A.NO. 80/2025 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-F AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo and submits that the relief sought for does not survive for consideration and the petition has been rendered infructuous. 2. The memo is taken on record. It reads as follows:- ”The undersigned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that, as the petition has become - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19934 WP No. 11441 of 2025 infructuous by virtue of the payment of the balance amount as directed by the Hon'ble Debts Recovery Tribunal, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the above writ petition as become infructuous in the interest of justice and equity." 3. In light of the memo filed and submission made, the petition is dismissed. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE VGR