APHC010341352013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH^ AT AMARAVATI am 5^ OO WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2819 OF 2013 Petition under Section 115 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the Docket Order dt. 26-7-2010 passed by the Hon'ble Senior Civil Judge Guntur in EP No. 3/2010 in OS No. 105/2006. Between: Sontireddy Narsi Reddy, S/o. Chinna Gurava Reddy R/o Palavai Village Rentachintala Mandal Guntur District. ...Petitioner AND M/s Kunala Subba Rao, Rep. by its Partner Kunala Upendra Gupta S/o Anjaneyulu, Age: 54 years, R/o D.No. 23-11-105, Eluru Bazar, Guntur. ...Respondent/DHR lA NO: 2 OF 2011(CRPMP 1335 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim suspension of the docket order dated 26.07.2010 passed by the Hon'ble Senior Civil Judge, Guntur in EP No.3/201 in OS No. 105/2006. Counsel for the Petitioner: Smt. V. SESHA KUMARI Counsel for the Respondent: — The Court made the following ORDER: APHCOI0341352013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2819/2013 Between: Sontireddy Narsi Reddy, Guntur Dist. ...PETITIONER AND M/s Kunala Subba Rao Guntur ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.VSESHA KUMARI Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following: HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2819 of 2013 ORDER: The present C.R.P is filed questioning the docket order dated 26.07.2010 passed in E.P.No.3 of 2010 in O.S.No.105 of 2006 by the 1 Additional Senior Civil Judge, Guntur, Guntur District, calling for issuance of arrest \A/arrant to the Petitioner as he was absent on 1. that day. Though, the order impugned is only a warrant of arrest, this Court 11.03.2011 granted stay subject to the condition of Petitioner depositing 50% of the decfeetal amount together with interest and costs within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of order, failing which the interim stayiShall .sjapd vacated without further reference to the Court. As the impugned order is self-explanatory, the Petitioner shall pay the balance amount within a period of six (6) months from today. In the event, the interim order passed by this Court is not complied with, the trial Court may proceed further against the Petitioner. With the above observation, the Civil Revision Petition is dispQsed of. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. 2. on 3. Sd/- SHAIK MOHD. RAFI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Senior Civil Judge, Guntur. 2. One CC to Smt. V. Sesha Kumari Advocate [OPUC] 3. The Section Officer, V.R Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. 4. Two CD Copies Chp HIGH COURT DATED:25/06/2025 ORDER CRP NO. 2819 OF 2013 DISPOSING OF THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION WITHOUT COSTS