Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24146 (GAU)

SONGITA DAAS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

AB/2045/2025 · 2025-10-28

Pranjal Das

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010176922025 2025:GAU-AS:14480 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2045/2025 SONGITA DAAS W/O LATE DR. ASHIS DAS R/O PUNYA ENCLAVE RGB ROAD, FLAT NO. 5A, P.S. DISPUR, KAMRUP (METRO), ASSAM, PIN-781006. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B SHARMA, MR. H DAS,P BHAGAT Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER Date : 29.10.2025 Heard Mr. B. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K.K. Parasar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.. 2. This petition under Section 482 BNSS is filed by the petitioner, namely, Page No.# 2/3 Smti Songita Daas, apprehending arrest in connection with CID Case No. 28/2019 registered at CID police station, Guwahati under Section 120B/468/471 IPC. 3. The present petitioner is stated to be a Legal Officer in House and Urban Development Corporation Ltd. (HUDCO). 4. The gist of the allegation is that forged documents were submitted in a proceeding before the DRT, and that the present petitioner along with other officials were also responsible for the same. It is alleged that other such cases were also there, particulars of which have been mentioned in the FIR and two of them have been charge-sheeted also. 5. The petitioner was granted interim protection vide order dated 26.09.2025 with condition. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant thereof, the petitioner has appeared before the I/O and statement has been recorded. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that DRT is seized most of the relevant documents in the DRT is proceeding before the learned Tribunal. 6. Case diary has been received. 7. The Additional Public Prosecutor has fairly submitted that the statement of the petitioner has been recorded. 8. As the investigation has progressed and the petitioner has already appeared and statement recorded – the interim protection vide dated 26.09.2025 is hereby made absolute subject to the conditions – that the petitioner shall be available for trial if one commences; and that the petitioner Page No.# 3/3 shall not hamper or tamper with evidence. 9. Violation or breach of condition(s) shall entail cancellation of the bail. 10. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. 11. Send back the case diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant